東華大學圖書館 |

The Effects of Implicit Learning, Practicing with the Expectation of Teaching, and Anxiety Training on Motor Performance Under Psychological Pressure.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Implicit Learning, Practicing with the Expectation of Teaching, and Anxiety Training on Motor Performance Under Psychological Pressure./
作者:	Cabral, Daniel Aranha Rego.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (122 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-10A.
標題:	Control theory. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30381384click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798377658801

The Effects of Implicit Learning, Practicing with the Expectation of Teaching, and Anxiety Training on Motor Performance Under Psychological Pressure.
Cabral, Daniel Aranha Rego.

The Effects of Implicit Learning, Practicing with the Expectation of Teaching, and Anxiety Training on Motor Performance Under Psychological Pressure. - 1 online resource (122 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Auburn University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation describes a research program focused on investigating learning strategies that could prevent individuals from showing inferior motor performance when performing under psychological pressure, a phenomenon known as choking under pressure. Choking has been studied from the perspective of different theories. Each theory attempts to explain the choking phenomenon by different mechanisms, such as distraction, self-focus, and perceived threat. Collectively, this dissertation investigates strategies based on these mechanisms that could potentially prevent choking. The first two chapters focus on the reinvestment theory, which suggests that anxiety leads to the disruption of the skill's performance due to the individual reinvesting attentional resources in skill execution by using declarative knowledge acquired earlier during practice, which reduces movement automaticity and hinders performance. Theoretically, by limiting the amount of declarative knowledge acquired during skill acquisition (e.g., implicit learning), individuals may be able to maintain performance under pressure. In the first chapter, a meta-analytic approach was used to investigate whether employing an implicit learning strategy, as opposed to explicit learning, during the practice of a motor skill would prevent choking under pressure on subsequent low- and high-pressure post-tests. Results showed that participants who learned a motor skill implicitly performed better under a high-pressure condition than a low-pressure post-test, whereas participants in the comparison group performed similarly between conditions.The second chapter is an attempt to test whether the benefits of practicing a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it to another person are preserved when the skill is performed under pressure if the skill is also practiced with an implicit learning strategy. This research follows prior findings that expecting to teach enhances skill learning, but also leads to choking under pressure. My results revealed that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching and used an implicit learning technique (i.e., analogy instructions) did not choke under pressure from low- to high-pressure post-test, whereas those who had the expectation of teaching and learned through a set of explicit instructions choked from low- to high-pressure. The third chapter investigates the effect of anxiety training (AT; i.e., practicing a skill under enhanced anxiety levels) on subsequent performance during low-, mild- and high-pressure post-test. This chapter was based on three different theories of choking, namely the reinvestment theory, attentional control theory, and biopsychosocial mode challenge and threat. All of them are speculated to explain the benefit of AT to performance under pressure. Accordingly, I measured mechanistic variables related to each theory (i.e., movement reinvestment, mental effort, and perceived challenge/threat). Participants were assigned to either an AT or control group. The former practiced a motor skill under mild levels of pressure, whereas the latter practiced the same motor skill but with no pressure. Results showed that the AT group preserved performance across the post-tests, whereas the control group choked from low- to mild-, and from mild- to high-pressure post-tests. However, I did not find evidence that the mechanistic variables explained the relationship between AT and choking.Taken together, the studies described in this dissertation show two potential interventions to prevent choking under pressure. First, as shown in the first two chapters, implicit learning seems to be an effective intervention to prevent choking (chapter 1) and to maintain the benefits of expecting to teach when performing under pressure (chapter 2). Second, practicing a motor skill under mild levels of anxiety is advantageous not only during a post-test with similar anxiety levels as the practice phase but also under a post-test with enhanced levels of anxiety, suggesting that the benefits of AT are transferrable to higher-stakes environments (chapter 3).

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798377658801Subjects--Topical Terms:

535880
Control theory.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Effects of Implicit Learning, Practicing with the Expectation of Teaching, and Anxiety Training on Motor Performance Under Psychological Pressure.
LDR:05560nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2359122
005 20230906055320.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798377658801
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30381384
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Auburn104158510
035 $a AAI30381384
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Cabral, Daniel Aranha Rego. $3 3699702
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Implicit Learning, Practicing with the Expectation of Teaching, and Anxiety Training on Motor Performance Under Psychological Pressure.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (122 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Miller, Matthew; Rudisill, Mary; Robinson, Jennifer; Wadsworth, Danielle.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Auburn University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation describes a research program focused on investigating learning strategies that could prevent individuals from showing inferior motor performance when performing under psychological pressure, a phenomenon known as choking under pressure. Choking has been studied from the perspective of different theories. Each theory attempts to explain the choking phenomenon by different mechanisms, such as distraction, self-focus, and perceived threat. Collectively, this dissertation investigates strategies based on these mechanisms that could potentially prevent choking. The first two chapters focus on the reinvestment theory, which suggests that anxiety leads to the disruption of the skill's performance due to the individual reinvesting attentional resources in skill execution by using declarative knowledge acquired earlier during practice, which reduces movement automaticity and hinders performance. Theoretically, by limiting the amount of declarative knowledge acquired during skill acquisition (e.g., implicit learning), individuals may be able to maintain performance under pressure. In the first chapter, a meta-analytic approach was used to investigate whether employing an implicit learning strategy, as opposed to explicit learning, during the practice of a motor skill would prevent choking under pressure on subsequent low- and high-pressure post-tests. Results showed that participants who learned a motor skill implicitly performed better under a high-pressure condition than a low-pressure post-test, whereas participants in the comparison group performed similarly between conditions.The second chapter is an attempt to test whether the benefits of practicing a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it to another person are preserved when the skill is performed under pressure if the skill is also practiced with an implicit learning strategy. This research follows prior findings that expecting to teach enhances skill learning, but also leads to choking under pressure. My results revealed that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching and used an implicit learning technique (i.e., analogy instructions) did not choke under pressure from low- to high-pressure post-test, whereas those who had the expectation of teaching and learned through a set of explicit instructions choked from low- to high-pressure. The third chapter investigates the effect of anxiety training (AT; i.e., practicing a skill under enhanced anxiety levels) on subsequent performance during low-, mild- and high-pressure post-test. This chapter was based on three different theories of choking, namely the reinvestment theory, attentional control theory, and biopsychosocial mode challenge and threat. All of them are speculated to explain the benefit of AT to performance under pressure. Accordingly, I measured mechanistic variables related to each theory (i.e., movement reinvestment, mental effort, and perceived challenge/threat). Participants were assigned to either an AT or control group. The former practiced a motor skill under mild levels of pressure, whereas the latter practiced the same motor skill but with no pressure. Results showed that the AT group preserved performance across the post-tests, whereas the control group choked from low- to mild-, and from mild- to high-pressure post-tests. However, I did not find evidence that the mechanistic variables explained the relationship between AT and choking.Taken together, the studies described in this dissertation show two potential interventions to prevent choking under pressure. First, as shown in the first two chapters, implicit learning seems to be an effective intervention to prevent choking (chapter 1) and to maintain the benefits of expecting to teach when performing under pressure (chapter 2). Second, practicing a motor skill under mild levels of anxiety is advantageous not only during a post-test with similar anxiety levels as the practice phase but also under a post-test with enhanced levels of anxiety, suggesting that the benefits of AT are transferrable to higher-stakes environments (chapter 3).
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Control theory. $3 535880
650 4 $a Anxiety. $3 520056
650 4 $a Basketball. $3 629604
650 4 $a Age. $3 1486010
650 4 $a Video recordings. $3 575241
650 4 $a Self report. $3 3699703
650 4 $a Intervention. $3 3435307
650 4 $a Table tennis. $3 548794
650 4 $a College students. $3 537393
650 4 $a Motor ability. $3 548676
650 4 $a Missing data. $3 3697670
650 4 $a Explicit knowledge. $3 3682762
650 4 $a Registration. $3 3682192
650 4 $a Performance evaluation. $3 3562292
650 4 $a Human subjects. $3 3562959
650 4 $a Heart rate. $3 3563099
650 4 $a Skills. $3 3221615
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 518431
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 3168411
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0719
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0790
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Auburn University. $3 1020457
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-10A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30381384 $z click for full text (PQDT)