東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Diagnosing the Will to Suffer: Loves...

Shmidt, Jane.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Diagnosing the Will to Suffer: Lovesickness in the Medical and Literary Traditions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Diagnosing the Will to Suffer: Lovesickness in the Medical and Literary Traditions./
作者:	Shmidt, Jane.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	270 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-04A.
標題:	Comparative literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10937129
ISBN:	9780438470194

Diagnosing the Will to Suffer: Lovesickness in the Medical and Literary Traditions.
Shmidt, Jane.

Diagnosing the Will to Suffer: Lovesickness in the Medical and Literary Traditions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 270 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Throughout Western medical history, unconsummated, unreturned, or otherwise failed love was believed to generate a disorder of the mind and body that manifested in physiological and psychological symptoms. This study traces the medical and literary history of lovesickness from antiquity through the 19th century, emphasizing significant moments in the development of the medical discourse on love. The project is part of the recent academic focus on the intersection between the humanities and the medical sciences, and it situates literary texts in concurrent medical and philosophical debates on afflictions of the psyche. By contextualizing the fictional works within the scientific theories that informed them, this study argues that the lovesick patient was a point of contact between literature and medicine and that literary authors participated in their own way in medicine's quest to understand love's complex psychological processes and to explain the relationship between those processes and bodily functions. This study aims to uncover the ways in which literary works reflected, diverged from, and anticipated scientific thought on the psyche and its afflictions, synthesizing three bodies of knowledge that rarely comment on one another: the history of medical science, the literary representation of disappointed love, and Freudian psychoanalysis. Questioning the tendency of medical science after the Scientific Revolution to conceive of lovesickness as a somatic malfunction that excluded the involvement of the rational faculty, literary works by Racine, Richardson, Austen, Gogol, Turgenev, and Dickens dramatized cases of lovesickness that resisted simple physiological etiologies. These accounts portrayed the lovesick subject as an active agent in constructing desire and as a willing sufferer of its effects. They explored psychical processes that were troubling for the concurrent medical model and addressed its limitations by uncovering psychological etiologies that anticipated future scientific discourse. Literature illustrated that love suffering may serve other needs of the psyche, such as to negotiate social norms that restrict the communication of feeling, to exercise a perverse power over the beloved, or to confront and mitigate early traumatic experiences, in a way that would not be described by medical science until the emergence of psychoanalytic frameworks.

ISBN: 9780438470194Subjects--Topical Terms:

570001
Comparative literature.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Literary criticism

Diagnosing the Will to Suffer: Lovesickness in the Medical and Literary Traditions.
LDR:03710nmm a2200409 4500 001 2273408
005 20201109122526.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438470194
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10937129
035 $a (MiAaPQ)minarees:15243
035 $a AAI10937129
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shmidt, Jane. $3 3550847
245 1 0 $a Diagnosing the Will to Suffer: Lovesickness in the Medical and Literary Traditions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 270 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Aciman, Andre.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Throughout Western medical history, unconsummated, unreturned, or otherwise failed love was believed to generate a disorder of the mind and body that manifested in physiological and psychological symptoms. This study traces the medical and literary history of lovesickness from antiquity through the 19th century, emphasizing significant moments in the development of the medical discourse on love. The project is part of the recent academic focus on the intersection between the humanities and the medical sciences, and it situates literary texts in concurrent medical and philosophical debates on afflictions of the psyche. By contextualizing the fictional works within the scientific theories that informed them, this study argues that the lovesick patient was a point of contact between literature and medicine and that literary authors participated in their own way in medicine's quest to understand love's complex psychological processes and to explain the relationship between those processes and bodily functions. This study aims to uncover the ways in which literary works reflected, diverged from, and anticipated scientific thought on the psyche and its afflictions, synthesizing three bodies of knowledge that rarely comment on one another: the history of medical science, the literary representation of disappointed love, and Freudian psychoanalysis. Questioning the tendency of medical science after the Scientific Revolution to conceive of lovesickness as a somatic malfunction that excluded the involvement of the rational faculty, literary works by Racine, Richardson, Austen, Gogol, Turgenev, and Dickens dramatized cases of lovesickness that resisted simple physiological etiologies. These accounts portrayed the lovesick subject as an active agent in constructing desire and as a willing sufferer of its effects. They explored psychical processes that were troubling for the concurrent medical model and addressed its limitations by uncovering psychological etiologies that anticipated future scientific discourse. Literature illustrated that love suffering may serve other needs of the psyche, such as to negotiate social norms that restrict the communication of feeling, to exercise a perverse power over the beloved, or to confront and mitigate early traumatic experiences, in a way that would not be described by medical science until the emergence of psychoanalytic frameworks.
590 $a School code: 0046.
650 4 $a Comparative literature. $3 570001
650 4 $a Slavic literature. $3 2144740
650 4 $a British & Irish literature. $3 3284317
653 $a Literary criticism
653 $a Lovesickness
653 $a Medical history
653 $a Medicine and literature
653 $a Psychoanalysis
653 $a Psychosomatic illness
690 $a 0295
690 $a 0314
690 $a 0593
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b Comparative Literature. $3 1285494
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-04A.
790 $a 0046
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10937129