東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The divided skeptic: Samuel Beckett'...

Berry, Brian John Dominguez.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The divided skeptic: Samuel Beckett's parody and Stanley Cavell's interpretation of philosophical skepticism.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The divided skeptic: Samuel Beckett's parody and Stanley Cavell's interpretation of philosophical skepticism./
作者:	Berry, Brian John Dominguez.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	142 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-08A(E).
標題:	Comparative literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10256681
ISBN:	9781369666175

The divided skeptic: Samuel Beckett's parody and Stanley Cavell's interpretation of philosophical skepticism.
Berry, Brian John Dominguez.

The divided skeptic: Samuel Beckett's parody and Stanley Cavell's interpretation of philosophical skepticism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 142 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2017.

Samuel Beckett seems to invite philosophical interpretation, with his characters that often question their surroundings, and that attempt to reason about existence and meaning. It is tempting to claim that Beckett's plays and novels are either doing philosophy or that they show that philosophy is a vain endeavor. My dissertation maintains that Beckett parodies philosophy in the sense that he draws on philosophical content, but uses it for different ends, generating humor without bringing philosophy to scorn. To illustrate this sense of parody and motivate the gesture, I turn to Stanley Cavell's interpretation of philosophical skepticism through the lens of ordinary language philosophy, which argues that skepticism creates its own problems by using language in ways that only have a use in skeptical reflection. Cavell acknowledges the point, but responds that the skeptic knows they are departing from ordinary language use, that their words are parodical, but that they cannot avoid this departure when in a certain mode of reflection. Beckett's characters inhabit this mode of reflection, but in various ways, they are doing it wrong. Where a philosopher might feel oppressed by the possibility of meaninglessness, the characters of Endgame make meaninglessness their goal, and are frustrated when meaning fails to fail. Where a skeptic might doubt their knowledge of a generic object (leading to universal doubt), the narrator of The Unnamable doubts his ability to identify a specific object, confusing identity and existence. And where a skeptic might feel that their language is private, isolating themselves from a shared form of life with the human species, the narrator of How It Is feels he has been expelled from humanity and strives in vain to create a new shared form of life, a new species. As a parody of a parody, Beckett's works do not invalidate skepticism, as skepticism does not invalidate ordinary language---both display a sincere ambivalence towards our shared forms of life.

ISBN: 9781369666175Subjects--Topical Terms:

570001
Comparative literature.

The divided skeptic: Samuel Beckett's parody and Stanley Cavell's interpretation of philosophical skepticism.
LDR:03014nmm a2200325 4500 001 2117834
005 20170602084412.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369666175
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10256681
035 $a AAI10256681
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Berry, Brian John Dominguez. $3 3279637
245 1 4 $a The divided skeptic: Samuel Beckett's parody and Stanley Cavell's interpretation of philosophical skepticism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 142 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Loren Kruger.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2017.
520 $a Samuel Beckett seems to invite philosophical interpretation, with his characters that often question their surroundings, and that attempt to reason about existence and meaning. It is tempting to claim that Beckett's plays and novels are either doing philosophy or that they show that philosophy is a vain endeavor. My dissertation maintains that Beckett parodies philosophy in the sense that he draws on philosophical content, but uses it for different ends, generating humor without bringing philosophy to scorn. To illustrate this sense of parody and motivate the gesture, I turn to Stanley Cavell's interpretation of philosophical skepticism through the lens of ordinary language philosophy, which argues that skepticism creates its own problems by using language in ways that only have a use in skeptical reflection. Cavell acknowledges the point, but responds that the skeptic knows they are departing from ordinary language use, that their words are parodical, but that they cannot avoid this departure when in a certain mode of reflection. Beckett's characters inhabit this mode of reflection, but in various ways, they are doing it wrong. Where a philosopher might feel oppressed by the possibility of meaninglessness, the characters of Endgame make meaninglessness their goal, and are frustrated when meaning fails to fail. Where a skeptic might doubt their knowledge of a generic object (leading to universal doubt), the narrator of The Unnamable doubts his ability to identify a specific object, confusing identity and existence. And where a skeptic might feel that their language is private, isolating themselves from a shared form of life with the human species, the narrator of How It Is feels he has been expelled from humanity and strives in vain to create a new shared form of life, a new species. As a parody of a parody, Beckett's works do not invalidate skepticism, as skepticism does not invalidate ordinary language---both display a sincere ambivalence towards our shared forms of life.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Comparative literature. $3 570001
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Theater. $3 522973
650 4 $a English literature. $3 516356
650 4 $a Romance literature. $3 2144781
690 $a 0295
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0465
690 $a 0593
690 $a 0313
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Comparative Literature. $3 1670301
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-08A(E).
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10256681