東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The standard(s) choice: Education ch...

Jernigan, Jeremy A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The standard(s) choice: Education choice & standards discourse in Indiana.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The standard(s) choice: Education choice & standards discourse in Indiana./
作者:	Jernigan, Jeremy A.
面頁冊數:	265 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-01A(E).
標題:	Education policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3722268
ISBN:	9781339042732

The standard(s) choice: Education choice & standards discourse in Indiana.
Jernigan, Jeremy A.

The standard(s) choice: Education choice & standards discourse in Indiana. - 265 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2015.

Education choice and standards-based accountability have been the two most dominant movements in U.S. education policy over at least the last quarter century. The integration of the two movements has become increasingly common in education policy frameworks, but the theoretical tension between the curricular autonomy and curricular alignment fundamental to the respective movements has never been fully resolved. This research explores the theoretical curricular tension between education choice and standards-based accountability through an analysis of the public discourse over the consideration, adoption, and implementation of Indiana's 2011 statewide voucher policy, the Choice Scholarship Program [CSP], as represented through two state newspapers. The dissertation begins with a reflection on the meaning of "curriculum," an overview of the U.S. education choice and standards-based accountability movements, and an explanation of the theoretical curricular tension between choice and standards-based accountability policies. The Indiana CSP, unique among U.S. voucher programs in the standards-based accountability policy mechanisms it includes, is then reviewed within a discussion of why it could lead to curricular tension in participating schools. I then discuss the discourse analysis methodologies used to examine (a) who participated in the public discourse over the state voucher policy; (b) what kinds of discursive frames participants used; and (c) how concepts related to education choice and standards---and potential curricular tension between the two---were framed. Research findings include a discussion of sixteen identified discourse actor groups and the nature and frequency of over twenty conceptual frames employed to define education vouchers, curriculum, and standards. I conclude with a proposed theory of contemporary curriculum diversity and ideas for future research.

ISBN: 9781339042732Subjects--Topical Terms:

2191387
Education policy.

The standard(s) choice: Education choice & standards discourse in Indiana.
LDR:02810nmm a2200301 4500 001 2074928
005 20161008135101.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339042732
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3722268
035 $a AAI3722268
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jernigan, Jeremy A. $3 3190285
245 1 4 $a The standard(s) choice: Education choice & standards discourse in Indiana.
300 $a 265 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Kunzman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2015.
520 $a Education choice and standards-based accountability have been the two most dominant movements in U.S. education policy over at least the last quarter century. The integration of the two movements has become increasingly common in education policy frameworks, but the theoretical tension between the curricular autonomy and curricular alignment fundamental to the respective movements has never been fully resolved. This research explores the theoretical curricular tension between education choice and standards-based accountability through an analysis of the public discourse over the consideration, adoption, and implementation of Indiana's 2011 statewide voucher policy, the Choice Scholarship Program [CSP], as represented through two state newspapers. The dissertation begins with a reflection on the meaning of "curriculum," an overview of the U.S. education choice and standards-based accountability movements, and an explanation of the theoretical curricular tension between choice and standards-based accountability policies. The Indiana CSP, unique among U.S. voucher programs in the standards-based accountability policy mechanisms it includes, is then reviewed within a discussion of why it could lead to curricular tension in participating schools. I then discuss the discourse analysis methodologies used to examine (a) who participated in the public discourse over the state voucher policy; (b) what kinds of discursive frames participants used; and (c) how concepts related to education choice and standards---and potential curricular tension between the two---were framed. Research findings include a discussion of sixteen identified discourse actor groups and the nature and frequency of over twenty conceptual frames employed to define education vouchers, curriculum, and standards. I conclude with a proposed theory of contemporary curriculum diversity and ideas for future research.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Educational sociology. $3 519608
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b School of Education. $3 1020202
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-01A(E).
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3722268