東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Know the score: An exploration of ke...

Muros, John Paul.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Know the score: An exploration of keying and scoring approaches for situational judgment tests.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Know the score: An exploration of keying and scoring approaches for situational judgment tests./
作者:	Muros, John Paul.
面頁冊數:	237 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-09, Section: B, page: 5819.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-09B.
標題:	Occupational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3328326
ISBN:	9780549810032

Know the score: An exploration of keying and scoring approaches for situational judgment tests.
Muros, John Paul.

Know the score: An exploration of keying and scoring approaches for situational judgment tests. - 237 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-09, Section: B, page: 5819.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2008.

Situational judgment tests (SJTs) present examinees with a series of domain-specific situations that require a response. In the years following a seminal article by Motowidlo, Dunnette, & Carter (1990), researchers have articulated a number of SJT features: they are economical to develop and administer, offer a valid means of predicting outcomes of interest, are well-received by applicants, result in reduced adverse impact, and appear to be less fakeable than other non-cognitive measures such as personality. A growing literature suggests that the choices made when developing, administering, or researching an SJT can moderate its features. Two areas for which very little empirical guidance exists are the keying and scoring of SJTs. Although many authors have underscored the need to generate more insights in these areas for conceptual, legal, and empirical reasons, research on these topics is seldom published. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of different keying and scoring approaches on an SJT's reliability, validity, and subgroup mean differences. The following exploratory research questions were proposed: (1) How do different answer keys compare in terms of agreement? (2) Do different keying and scoring approaches moderate the reliability and validity of SJTs? (3) How are Male-Female subgroup differences affected by keying and scoring approaches ? The data used for this study came from a nationwide sample of ROTC cadets and midshipmen (N = 153). Individual difference variables were measured for this sample (cognitive ability, Big Five personality), and respondents completed a rigorously-developed SJT assessing five dimensions of performance, which were also reflected in a criterion performance measure completed by multiple peer raters. The results of this research contribute to the science and practice of situational judgment testing by demonstrating the ways in which agreement, reliability, and validity vary as a function of keying and scoring decisions.

ISBN: 9780549810032Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122852
Occupational psychology.

Know the score: An exploration of keying and scoring approaches for situational judgment tests.
LDR:02930nmm a2200289 4500 001 2070625
005 20160617121830.5
008 170521s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549810032
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3328326
035 $a AAI3328326
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Muros, John Paul. $3 3185690
245 1 0 $a Know the score: An exploration of keying and scoring approaches for situational judgment tests.
300 $a 237 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-09, Section: B, page: 5819.
500 $a Adviser: John P. Campbell.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2008.
520 $a Situational judgment tests (SJTs) present examinees with a series of domain-specific situations that require a response. In the years following a seminal article by Motowidlo, Dunnette, & Carter (1990), researchers have articulated a number of SJT features: they are economical to develop and administer, offer a valid means of predicting outcomes of interest, are well-received by applicants, result in reduced adverse impact, and appear to be less fakeable than other non-cognitive measures such as personality. A growing literature suggests that the choices made when developing, administering, or researching an SJT can moderate its features. Two areas for which very little empirical guidance exists are the keying and scoring of SJTs. Although many authors have underscored the need to generate more insights in these areas for conceptual, legal, and empirical reasons, research on these topics is seldom published. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of different keying and scoring approaches on an SJT's reliability, validity, and subgroup mean differences. The following exploratory research questions were proposed: (1) How do different answer keys compare in terms of agreement? (2) Do different keying and scoring approaches moderate the reliability and validity of SJTs? (3) How are Male-Female subgroup differences affected by keying and scoring approaches ? The data used for this study came from a nationwide sample of ROTC cadets and midshipmen (N = 153). Individual difference variables were measured for this sample (cognitive ability, Big Five personality), and respondents completed a rigorously-developed SJT assessing five dimensions of performance, which were also reflected in a criterion performance measure completed by multiple peer raters. The results of this research contribute to the science and practice of situational judgment testing by demonstrating the ways in which agreement, reliability, and validity vary as a function of keying and scoring decisions.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0632
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $3 676231
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-09B.
790 $a 0130
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3328326