東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Practices of the global self: Ideali...

Alpert, Avram.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Practices of the global self: Idealism, Transcendentalism, and Buddhist Modernism in the era of colonization.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Practices of the global self: Idealism, Transcendentalism, and Buddhist Modernism in the era of colonization./
作者:	Alpert, Avram.
面頁冊數:	422 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-09A(E).
標題:	Comparative literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3622002
ISBN:	9781303935800

Practices of the global self: Idealism, Transcendentalism, and Buddhist Modernism in the era of colonization.
Alpert, Avram.

Practices of the global self: Idealism, Transcendentalism, and Buddhist Modernism in the era of colonization. - 422 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2014.

In this project, I explore how Idealism, Transcendentalism, and Buddhist Modernism developed modes of thought to embrace the fact of living on a single, shared globe. I argue that there is a previously unexplored connection between these movements, predicated precisely on a debate about how to think globally. Furthermore, I argue that understanding the relations and differences between these three movements gives us a new vantage on the globality of modern letters as such. To begin, I show how the Idealists developed a synthetic apparatus (the dialectic), committed to the enlightenment of all peoples, but were convinced that European forms of thought and governance were the only possible route to - and meaning of - enlightenment. They argued explicitly that enlightenment was the capacity to unite "savage instinct" with "civilized rationality," and developed concepts like autonomy (Kant), dialectics (Hegel), aesthetics (Schiller), and communism (Marx) to name how this form of life could be achieved. The Transcendentalists, in response, denied the claim that there was a unique path to enlightenment through the process of synthesizing world cultures. To the contrary, they argued, dynamics of continual difference formed the paths of progress and the routes toward ever better forms of life. Rather than synthesizing cultures, we are to learn to move between them, respecting each as dynamic collectivities always evolving through new connections and historical patterns. Buddhist modernism, finally, is a complex and often misunderstood movement that worked to transform the archives and practices of various Buddhist traditions in the late 19th and early 20th century. One major claim in this project is that we should understood Buddhist modernism not as an adaptation to the demands of the West, as is common today, but rather as a key interlocutor in debates about global thought. I argue that practices like meditation and the goal of egolessness were redefined as practices of the self that allowed one to think more globally. Concluding with 20th century literary engagements with Buddhism, I argue that contemporary literature continues to be part of complex, interactional, and international movements struggling to articulate the best modes of global thought available today.

ISBN: 9781303935800Subjects--Topical Terms:

570001
Comparative literature.

Practices of the global self: Idealism, Transcendentalism, and Buddhist Modernism in the era of colonization.
LDR:03213nmm a2200277 4500 001 2068841
005 20160428075024.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303935800
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3622002
035 $a AAI3622002
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Alpert, Avram. $3 3183813
245 1 0 $a Practices of the global self: Idealism, Transcendentalism, and Buddhist Modernism in the era of colonization.
300 $a 422 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jean-Michel Rabate.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2014.
520 $a In this project, I explore how Idealism, Transcendentalism, and Buddhist Modernism developed modes of thought to embrace the fact of living on a single, shared globe. I argue that there is a previously unexplored connection between these movements, predicated precisely on a debate about how to think globally. Furthermore, I argue that understanding the relations and differences between these three movements gives us a new vantage on the globality of modern letters as such. To begin, I show how the Idealists developed a synthetic apparatus (the dialectic), committed to the enlightenment of all peoples, but were convinced that European forms of thought and governance were the only possible route to - and meaning of - enlightenment. They argued explicitly that enlightenment was the capacity to unite "savage instinct" with "civilized rationality," and developed concepts like autonomy (Kant), dialectics (Hegel), aesthetics (Schiller), and communism (Marx) to name how this form of life could be achieved. The Transcendentalists, in response, denied the claim that there was a unique path to enlightenment through the process of synthesizing world cultures. To the contrary, they argued, dynamics of continual difference formed the paths of progress and the routes toward ever better forms of life. Rather than synthesizing cultures, we are to learn to move between them, respecting each as dynamic collectivities always evolving through new connections and historical patterns. Buddhist modernism, finally, is a complex and often misunderstood movement that worked to transform the archives and practices of various Buddhist traditions in the late 19th and early 20th century. One major claim in this project is that we should understood Buddhist modernism not as an adaptation to the demands of the West, as is common today, but rather as a key interlocutor in debates about global thought. I argue that practices like meditation and the goal of egolessness were redefined as practices of the self that allowed one to think more globally. Concluding with 20th century literary engagements with Buddhism, I argue that contemporary literature continues to be part of complex, interactional, and international movements struggling to articulate the best modes of global thought available today.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Comparative literature. $3 570001
650 4 $a Comparative religion. $2 bicssc $3 2079449
690 $a 0295
690 $a 0618
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b Comparative Literature and Literary Theory. $3 2095610
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-09A(E).
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3622002