東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Misunderstanding and miscommunicatio...

Pendleton, Kim H.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Misunderstanding and miscommunication: How stakeholders interpret the teacher evaluation process in Louisiana.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Misunderstanding and miscommunication: How stakeholders interpret the teacher evaluation process in Louisiana./
作者:	Pendleton, Kim H.
面頁冊數:	167 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-10A(E).
標題:	Education, Leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3624731
ISBN:	9781303987069

Misunderstanding and miscommunication: How stakeholders interpret the teacher evaluation process in Louisiana.
Pendleton, Kim H.

Misunderstanding and miscommunication: How stakeholders interpret the teacher evaluation process in Louisiana. - 167 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Keiser University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of teachers, teacher-leaders, and administrators to determine how classroom teachers should be assessed for proficiency during their evaluative process. In the 2012--2013 school year, the Louisiana Department of Education implemented a new statewide teacher evaluation system, called Clear Overall Measure of Performance to Analyze and Support Success (COMPASS). Piloted in a few schools across the state of Louisiana, COMPASS has undergone significant changes since its implementation. This evaluation system was the single evaluative tool used in this study to explore the validity of assessment factors in determining teacher proficiency and the value teacher opinions have in the development and implementation of an evaluative process. Using an explanatory, sequential, mixed methods research design in 26 school districts across the state of Louisiana, the study included a survey instrument administered to 575 participants consisting of teachers, teacher-leaders, and school and district leaders. There were three homogeneous focus groups of teachers, teacher-leaders, and school leaders for a total of 15 participants from central, north and south Louisiana. The results of the study indicated the evaluation process lacks equity in goal setting, the assigned weight of student achievement on teacher proficiency should be re-evaluated, and teacher development is not supported consistently. Implications affect policymakers, instructional leaders, and teachers.

ISBN: 9781303987069Subjects--Topical Terms:

1035576
Education, Leadership.

Misunderstanding and miscommunication: How stakeholders interpret the teacher evaluation process in Louisiana.
LDR:02522nmm a2200301 4500 001 2056128
005 20150429102533.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303987069
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3624731
035 $a AAI3624731
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Pendleton, Kim H. $3 3169861
245 1 0 $a Misunderstanding and miscommunication: How stakeholders interpret the teacher evaluation process in Louisiana.
300 $a 167 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jackie L. Booth.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Keiser University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of teachers, teacher-leaders, and administrators to determine how classroom teachers should be assessed for proficiency during their evaluative process. In the 2012--2013 school year, the Louisiana Department of Education implemented a new statewide teacher evaluation system, called Clear Overall Measure of Performance to Analyze and Support Success (COMPASS). Piloted in a few schools across the state of Louisiana, COMPASS has undergone significant changes since its implementation. This evaluation system was the single evaluative tool used in this study to explore the validity of assessment factors in determining teacher proficiency and the value teacher opinions have in the development and implementation of an evaluative process. Using an explanatory, sequential, mixed methods research design in 26 school districts across the state of Louisiana, the study included a survey instrument administered to 575 participants consisting of teachers, teacher-leaders, and school and district leaders. There were three homogeneous focus groups of teachers, teacher-leaders, and school leaders for a total of 15 participants from central, north and south Louisiana. The results of the study indicated the evaluation process lacks equity in goal setting, the assigned weight of student achievement on teacher proficiency should be re-evaluated, and teacher development is not supported consistently. Implications affect policymakers, instructional leaders, and teachers.
590 $a School code: 1704.
650 4 $a Education, Leadership. $3 1035576
650 4 $a Education, Evaluation. $3 1669638
650 4 $a Education, Policy. $3 1669130
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a Keiser University. $b Keiser University Graduate School-Education. $3 2097300
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-10A(E).
790 $a 1704
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3624731