東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Beyond the Skilled Application of Kn...

Boney, Kathryn M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Beyond the Skilled Application of Know-How: Pedagogical Reasoning as Phronesis in Highly Competent Teachers.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Beyond the Skilled Application of Know-How: Pedagogical Reasoning as Phronesis in Highly Competent Teachers./
作者:	Boney, Kathryn M.
面頁冊數:	285 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-08A(E).
標題:	Education, Pedagogy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3617832
ISBN:	9781303856495

Beyond the Skilled Application of Know-How: Pedagogical Reasoning as Phronesis in Highly Competent Teachers.
Boney, Kathryn M.

Beyond the Skilled Application of Know-How: Pedagogical Reasoning as Phronesis in Highly Competent Teachers. - 285 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2014.

Given the teacher-as-technician view and the instrumentalist values that pervade professional schools, practices, and policy decisions (Kinsella & Pitman, 2012a; Zeichner, 2012) with regard to teacher qualification, evidence-based practices, and scripted curricula, there is growing concern that something of fundamental importance and moral significance is missing from the vision of what it means to be a professional, particularly in the field of education. In order to articulate teacher practical knowledge in a way that reflects the complexities of practice, a framework that captures the complexity of teaching practice and helps to define the type of knowledge beyond content and technique, which enables teachers to make practically wise decisions is needed. The purpose of this study was to explore and describe the practical reasoning of highly competent teachers as it is revealed through meaning making about their experiences of pedagogical reasoning. The aim of this study was to provide an interpretive description of teacher pedagogical reasoning, then utilize the construct of professional phronesis as a framework for understanding the dimension of teacher knowledge involved in judgment (Coulter & Wiens, 2002; Kinsella, 2012).

ISBN: 9781303856495Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669025
Education, Pedagogy.

Beyond the Skilled Application of Know-How: Pedagogical Reasoning as Phronesis in Highly Competent Teachers.
LDR:04270nmm a2200301 4500 001 2055215
005 20141112080405.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303856495
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3617832
035 $a AAI3617832
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Boney, Kathryn M. $3 3168849
245 1 0 $a Beyond the Skilled Application of Know-How: Pedagogical Reasoning as Phronesis in Highly Competent Teachers.
300 $a 285 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Patricia Jones.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2014.
520 $a Given the teacher-as-technician view and the instrumentalist values that pervade professional schools, practices, and policy decisions (Kinsella & Pitman, 2012a; Zeichner, 2012) with regard to teacher qualification, evidence-based practices, and scripted curricula, there is growing concern that something of fundamental importance and moral significance is missing from the vision of what it means to be a professional, particularly in the field of education. In order to articulate teacher practical knowledge in a way that reflects the complexities of practice, a framework that captures the complexity of teaching practice and helps to define the type of knowledge beyond content and technique, which enables teachers to make practically wise decisions is needed. The purpose of this study was to explore and describe the practical reasoning of highly competent teachers as it is revealed through meaning making about their experiences of pedagogical reasoning. The aim of this study was to provide an interpretive description of teacher pedagogical reasoning, then utilize the construct of professional phronesis as a framework for understanding the dimension of teacher knowledge involved in judgment (Coulter & Wiens, 2002; Kinsella, 2012).
520 $a In order to develop a detailed, multi-perspectival account of the constructs of pedagogical reasoning and professional phronesis, I employed an interpretive phenomenological case study design (Smith et al. 2009) to examine the experiences of three participants. Analysis of the data revealed the pedagogical reasoning of the participants as a knowledge that continuously develops over time through a corpus of instructional experiences including: purposeful professional development, problem solving and reflection. The pedagogical reasoning of the participants was also found to operate as an instructional decision-making process that occurs in two modes: in deliberate planning and preparation for instruction, and spontaneously as they engage in instruction. Finally, the pedagogical reasoning of the participants was characterized by an orientation towards achieving multiple goals at once. All participants acknowledged the content of her discipline as an established goal; however, they described their decision-making in terms of goals for both themselves as practitioners regarding their role in student learning, as well as goals for student outcomes that extended beyond the development of student content knowledge. Professional/personal and instructional goals are tied to the identities of the individual participants and reflect how the unique dispositions of the participants influences the factors they consider in making instructional decisions, regardless of operational mode. Finally, all participants discussed a personal paradigmatic shift in focus from an early-career focus on content delivery to a focus on the needs of individual students and the necessity of developing relationships with students in order to achieve their personal/professional goals and goals for student growth. These themes regarding the experience of pedagogical reasoning reflected the six features of professional phronesis outlined by Kinsella and Pitman (2012b), which suggests that phronesis is a viable construct within the practice knowledge of highly competent teachers.
590 $a School code: 0206.
650 4 $a Education, Pedagogy. $3 1669025
650 4 $a Education, Philosophy of. $3 783746
650 4 $a Education, Teacher Training. $3 783747
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0998
690 $a 0530
710 2 $a University of South Florida. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 3168850
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-08A(E).
790 $a 0206
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3617832