東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Making Gender Matter: Knowledge Ecol...

Wood, Christine Virginia.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Making Gender Matter: Knowledge Ecologies, Contested Research Objects, and the Trajectory of Women's and Gender Studies in American Universities, 1970-2010.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Making Gender Matter: Knowledge Ecologies, Contested Research Objects, and the Trajectory of Women's and Gender Studies in American Universities, 1970-2010./
作者:	Wood, Christine Virginia.
面頁冊數:	219 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-07A(E).
標題:	Sociology, Organizational. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3615542
ISBN:	9781303815621

Making Gender Matter: Knowledge Ecologies, Contested Research Objects, and the Trajectory of Women's and Gender Studies in American Universities, 1970-2010.
Wood, Christine Virginia.

Making Gender Matter: Knowledge Ecologies, Contested Research Objects, and the Trajectory of Women's and Gender Studies in American Universities, 1970-2010. - 219 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2014.

This dissertation examines the trajectory of research programs on women and gender in American universities between 1970 and 2010. The dissertation melds perspectives in the sociology of science with organizational analyses of the development of academic disciplines. The analysis forwards a new understanding of how local conditions in research settings influence the trajectory of interdisciplinary development. Women's and gender studies is an interdisciplinary field that originated in connection with second wave feminism and the accompanying view that previous scholarship had omitted women when drawing conclusions about the population. In its developmental trajectory women's studies underwent a process of intellectual and institutional diversification. Women's studies programs began with uniform intellectual goals: to address the lack of scholarship on women and to analyze problems related to sex stratification. As programs spread, scholars across institutions redefined their research interests, incorporating topics that transcended the study of women, such as masculinities and sexual identity. The diversification of research agendas in gender studies across universities was uneven, a result of shifting resources and relationships within programs and the pliable quality of objects of analysis like "women" and "gender," which are used in increasingly diverse ways. I introduce the concepts of knowledge "ecologies" and "supple objects" to explain the diversification of women's and gender studies programs and departments, arguing that the local conditions within departments bore an intimate relationship with the way scholars defined and use core categories of knowledge over time, and, consequently, with the way departments set priorities around studying women and gender. The finding that programs began with homogenous content and diversified only later in their development is distinct from "new institutional" models that see the departments that form a discipline as becoming more structurally similar over time, as well as models that see departments as bearing the distinct imprints of their founding conditions over time. Data are archival records from women's and gender studies departments and programs, semi-structured interviews with professors, data on employment and career trajectories of scholars with appointments in programs, and content analysis of research output.

ISBN: 9781303815621Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018023
Sociology, Organizational.

Making Gender Matter: Knowledge Ecologies, Contested Research Objects, and the Trajectory of Women's and Gender Studies in American Universities, 1970-2010.
LDR:03450nam a2200313 4500 001 1962725
005 20140819094536.5
008 150210s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303815621
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3615542
035 $a AAI3615542
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wood, Christine Virginia. $3 2098829
245 1 0 $a Making Gender Matter: Knowledge Ecologies, Contested Research Objects, and the Trajectory of Women's and Gender Studies in American Universities, 1970-2010.
300 $a 219 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Charles M. Camic; Ann S. Orloff.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2014.
520 $a This dissertation examines the trajectory of research programs on women and gender in American universities between 1970 and 2010. The dissertation melds perspectives in the sociology of science with organizational analyses of the development of academic disciplines. The analysis forwards a new understanding of how local conditions in research settings influence the trajectory of interdisciplinary development. Women's and gender studies is an interdisciplinary field that originated in connection with second wave feminism and the accompanying view that previous scholarship had omitted women when drawing conclusions about the population. In its developmental trajectory women's studies underwent a process of intellectual and institutional diversification. Women's studies programs began with uniform intellectual goals: to address the lack of scholarship on women and to analyze problems related to sex stratification. As programs spread, scholars across institutions redefined their research interests, incorporating topics that transcended the study of women, such as masculinities and sexual identity. The diversification of research agendas in gender studies across universities was uneven, a result of shifting resources and relationships within programs and the pliable quality of objects of analysis like "women" and "gender," which are used in increasingly diverse ways. I introduce the concepts of knowledge "ecologies" and "supple objects" to explain the diversification of women's and gender studies programs and departments, arguing that the local conditions within departments bore an intimate relationship with the way scholars defined and use core categories of knowledge over time, and, consequently, with the way departments set priorities around studying women and gender. The finding that programs began with homogenous content and diversified only later in their development is distinct from "new institutional" models that see the departments that form a discipline as becoming more structurally similar over time, as well as models that see departments as bearing the distinct imprints of their founding conditions over time. Data are archival records from women's and gender studies departments and programs, semi-structured interviews with professors, data on employment and career trajectories of scholars with appointments in programs, and content analysis of research output.
590 $a School code: 0163.
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
650 4 $a Gender Studies. $3 898693
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Women's Studies. $3 1017481
650 4 $a Sociology, Organization Theory. $3 1669248
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0733
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0453
690 $a 0635
710 2 $a Northwestern University. $b Sociology. $3 1020890
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-07A(E).
790 $a 0163
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3615542