東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Decision-making processes and budget...

Stanley, Tuesday Lee.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Decision-making processes and budget outcomes during state appropriation reductions: A case study at San Jacinto College (Texas).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Decision-making processes and budget outcomes during state appropriation reductions: A case study at San Jacinto College (Texas)./
作者:	Stanley, Tuesday Lee.
面頁冊數:	166 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 0873.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-03A.
標題:	Education, Community College. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3168045
ISBN:	0542038935

Decision-making processes and budget outcomes during state appropriation reductions: A case study at San Jacinto College (Texas).
Stanley, Tuesday Lee.

Decision-making processes and budget outcomes during state appropriation reductions: A case study at San Jacinto College (Texas). - 166 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 0873.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2005.

Texas higher education experienced unprecedented enrollment and budget growth during the 1960s and 1970s. Administrators were formally trained in managing the growth of these colleges and universities, with little thought to controlling costs or responding to state appropriation reductions. The funding picture dramatically changed in the 1980s and appropriations for public colleges and universities in Texas have remained volatile over the past two and half decades. During this time, administrators at Texas' public higher education institutions have had to learn to make difficult retrenchment decisions. While a decision-making process may not have consciously been chosen, historically, budget outcomes have followed decision-making theories. For this case study of San Jacinto College, a Hispanic serving institution, the decision-making process and the outcomes reached when building their budget in 2002--2003 and 2003--2004 were examined. Specifically two decision-making models---rational choice theory and the garbage can model---were used to examine the process. The rational choice theory suggests that data are used to support rational decisions based on rules and regulations, mission and goals and constituents. The garbage can model recognizes that there is often not enough time to gather valuable data; decisions are chaotic, based on politics and power. During the 2002--2003 state appropriation reduction period, the leadership of the College had little time to respond to the appropriate reductions and thus they followed the Governor's suggestion to reduce travel, capital outlay and personnel; not able to take the time to reflect on the College's annual plan or long term goals, a classic component of the garbage can model. For the 2003--2004 fiscal year, San Jacinto College was able to reflect on their strategic goals, take time to plan and communicate their actions to their constituents and reduce their operating budget in ways that were not detrimental to their long-term viability. During this reduction period, the leadership of the College made the most of the available time to make budget decisions that were cognizant of their constituents, a reflection of the attributes of the rational choice theory.

ISBN: 0542038935Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018008
Education, Community College.

Decision-making processes and budget outcomes during state appropriation reductions: A case study at San Jacinto College (Texas).
LDR:03187nmm 2200277 4500 001 1812134
005 20060418073015.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542038935
035 $a (UnM)AAI3168045
035 $a AAI3168045
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Stanley, Tuesday Lee. $3 1901691
245 1 0 $a Decision-making processes and budget outcomes during state appropriation reductions: A case study at San Jacinto College (Texas).
300 $a 166 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 0873.
500 $a Adviser: Lawrence Schall.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2005.
520 $a Texas higher education experienced unprecedented enrollment and budget growth during the 1960s and 1970s. Administrators were formally trained in managing the growth of these colleges and universities, with little thought to controlling costs or responding to state appropriation reductions. The funding picture dramatically changed in the 1980s and appropriations for public colleges and universities in Texas have remained volatile over the past two and half decades. During this time, administrators at Texas' public higher education institutions have had to learn to make difficult retrenchment decisions. While a decision-making process may not have consciously been chosen, historically, budget outcomes have followed decision-making theories. For this case study of San Jacinto College, a Hispanic serving institution, the decision-making process and the outcomes reached when building their budget in 2002--2003 and 2003--2004 were examined. Specifically two decision-making models---rational choice theory and the garbage can model---were used to examine the process. The rational choice theory suggests that data are used to support rational decisions based on rules and regulations, mission and goals and constituents. The garbage can model recognizes that there is often not enough time to gather valuable data; decisions are chaotic, based on politics and power. During the 2002--2003 state appropriation reduction period, the leadership of the College had little time to respond to the appropriate reductions and thus they followed the Governor's suggestion to reduce travel, capital outlay and personnel; not able to take the time to reflect on the College's annual plan or long term goals, a classic component of the garbage can model. For the 2003--2004 fiscal year, San Jacinto College was able to reflect on their strategic goals, take time to plan and communicate their actions to their constituents and reduce their operating budget in ways that were not detrimental to their long-term viability. During this reduction period, the leadership of the College made the most of the available time to make budget decisions that were cognizant of their constituents, a reflection of the attributes of the rational choice theory.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Education, Community College. $3 1018008
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0277
710 2 0 $a University of Pennsylvania. $3 1017401
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-03A.
790 1 0 $a Schall, Lawrence, $e advisor
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3168045