東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Organization Change in Higher Educat...

Johnson, Angela.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Organization Change in Higher Education: Transforming Institutions of Learning into Learning Organizations.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Organization Change in Higher Education: Transforming Institutions of Learning into Learning Organizations./
作者:	Johnson, Angela.
面頁冊數:	39 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-05, page: 2903.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International49-05.
標題:	Education, Leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1492531
ISBN:	9781124646961

Organization Change in Higher Education: Transforming Institutions of Learning into Learning Organizations.
Johnson, Angela.

Organization Change in Higher Education: Transforming Institutions of Learning into Learning Organizations. - 39 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-05, page: 2903.

Thesis (M.A.)--The College of St. Scholastica, 2011.

This paper discusses how the subcultures of higher education institutions can be better integrated through the process of organization development (OD), thereby transforming the institution into a learning organization as conceived by Peter Senge (1990a). A Bohmian dialogue session was conducted at a small Midwestern private college, The College of St. Scholastica, to solicit feedback from faculty, staff, and administration about the level of integration of the subcultures, potential barriers to organizational and double-loop learning, and suggestions for addressing those barriers. Researchers summarized participants' comments during the dialogue, and a modified content analysis was used to identify themes related to organizational learning. The five main factors influencing organizational learning that emerged were: 1) communication, 2) the compartmentalized organizational structure, 3) decision-making processes at the administrative level, 4) role clarity, and 5) time for reflective learning. Participants offered suggestions for improvement that would need to be initiated at the administrative level. Interaction across the subgroups could be improved through increased and more open communication, more frequent opportunities for social interaction, more inclusive decision-making processes, role clarification, and a decided emphasis on the importance of reflective learning. Implementing these changes will result in enhanced collaboration among the organization's subgroups, thereby promoting organizational learning. This study also offers a model to other higher education institutions for how OD principles can be used in the higher education environment to facilitate transformational change through the integration of organizational subcultures.

ISBN: 9781124646961Subjects--Topical Terms:

1035576
Education, Leadership.

Organization Change in Higher Education: Transforming Institutions of Learning into Learning Organizations.
LDR:02755nam 2200301 4500 001 1404079
005 20111116122927.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124646961
035 $a (UMI)AAI1492531
035 $a AAI1492531
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Johnson, Angela. $3 541059
245 1 0 $a Organization Change in Higher Education: Transforming Institutions of Learning into Learning Organizations.
300 $a 39 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-05, page: 2903.
500 $a Adviser: Robert J. Hartl.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The College of St. Scholastica, 2011.
520 $a This paper discusses how the subcultures of higher education institutions can be better integrated through the process of organization development (OD), thereby transforming the institution into a learning organization as conceived by Peter Senge (1990a). A Bohmian dialogue session was conducted at a small Midwestern private college, The College of St. Scholastica, to solicit feedback from faculty, staff, and administration about the level of integration of the subcultures, potential barriers to organizational and double-loop learning, and suggestions for addressing those barriers. Researchers summarized participants' comments during the dialogue, and a modified content analysis was used to identify themes related to organizational learning. The five main factors influencing organizational learning that emerged were: 1) communication, 2) the compartmentalized organizational structure, 3) decision-making processes at the administrative level, 4) role clarity, and 5) time for reflective learning. Participants offered suggestions for improvement that would need to be initiated at the administrative level. Interaction across the subgroups could be improved through increased and more open communication, more frequent opportunities for social interaction, more inclusive decision-making processes, role clarification, and a decided emphasis on the importance of reflective learning. Implementing these changes will result in enhanced collaboration among the organization's subgroups, thereby promoting organizational learning. This study also offers a model to other higher education institutions for how OD principles can be used in the higher education environment to facilitate transformational change through the integration of organizational subcultures.
590 $a School code: 0614.
650 4 $a Education, Leadership. $3 1035576
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a The College of St. Scholastica. $b Management. $3 1671699
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 49-05.
790 1 0 $a Hartl, Robert J., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Swenson, David X. $e committee member
790 $a 0614
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1492531