東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Standards-Based Curriculum, Differen...

Hartnell, Benjamin Jeffry.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Standards-Based Curriculum, Differentiated Instruction, and End of Course Assessments.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Standards-Based Curriculum, Differentiated Instruction, and End of Course Assessments./
作者:	Hartnell, Benjamin Jeffry.
面頁冊數:	185 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-05A.
標題:	Education, Leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3443953
ISBN:	9781124506562

Standards-Based Curriculum, Differentiated Instruction, and End of Course Assessments.
Hartnell, Benjamin Jeffry.

Standards-Based Curriculum, Differentiated Instruction, and End of Course Assessments. - 185 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Walden University, 2011.

Differentiated instruction, standards-based curriculum, and end of course assessments (ECAs) are not mandated in most high schools across the United States. As such, classroom grades do not accurately reflect district report cards. In particular, grades at the study site, a suburban high school, do not show the specific standards and benchmarks students have mastered, nor those still needing addressed. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of differentiation and standards-based curriculums on common ECAs at the high school. This quasi-experimental study with between-group comparative design addressed whether students in differentiated classrooms that utilized standards-based curriculums scored higher on ECAs than did those in traditional (nondifferentiated) classrooms. The theoretical basis for this study was the theory of differentiation, or modifying instruction to meet the needs of all learners. Independent-samples t tests found no statistically significant differences between mean ECA scores of students in differentiated/GLI classrooms and students in traditional classrooms. This study may influence social change by contributing to the discussion of standards-based assessments, standards-based curriculums, and standards-based reporting for all subjects in Grades 6-12. In so doing, schools and districts can better use their district report card to help understand their adequate yearly progress (AYP). The results suggest additional research into the potential impact of differentiated curriculums on subgroup populations such as gender or race.

ISBN: 9781124506562Subjects--Topical Terms:

1035576
Education, Leadership.

Standards-Based Curriculum, Differentiated Instruction, and End of Course Assessments.
LDR:02607nam 2200325 4500 001 1404021
005 20111116122907.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124506562
035 $a (UMI)AAI3443953
035 $a AAI3443953
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Hartnell, Benjamin Jeffry. $3 1683317
245 1 0 $a Standards-Based Curriculum, Differentiated Instruction, and End of Course Assessments.
300 $a 185 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Aaron Deris.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Walden University, 2011.
520 $a Differentiated instruction, standards-based curriculum, and end of course assessments (ECAs) are not mandated in most high schools across the United States. As such, classroom grades do not accurately reflect district report cards. In particular, grades at the study site, a suburban high school, do not show the specific standards and benchmarks students have mastered, nor those still needing addressed. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of differentiation and standards-based curriculums on common ECAs at the high school. This quasi-experimental study with between-group comparative design addressed whether students in differentiated classrooms that utilized standards-based curriculums scored higher on ECAs than did those in traditional (nondifferentiated) classrooms. The theoretical basis for this study was the theory of differentiation, or modifying instruction to meet the needs of all learners. Independent-samples t tests found no statistically significant differences between mean ECA scores of students in differentiated/GLI classrooms and students in traditional classrooms. This study may influence social change by contributing to the discussion of standards-based assessments, standards-based curriculums, and standards-based reporting for all subjects in Grades 6-12. In so doing, schools and districts can better use their district report card to help understand their adequate yearly progress (AYP). The results suggest additional research into the potential impact of differentiated curriculums on subgroup populations such as gender or race.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Education, Leadership. $3 1035576
650 4 $a Education, Policy. $3 1669130
650 4 $a Education, Teacher Training. $3 783747
650 4 $a Education, Secondary. $3 539262
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0533
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Education. $3 1022723
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-05A.
790 1 0 $a Deris, Aaron, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Santin, Claudia $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Brown, Michelle $e committee member
790 $a 0543
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3443953