東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Personality test interpretation and ...

Horner, Pamela A.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Personality test interpretation and the working alliance.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Personality test interpretation and the working alliance./
Author:	Horner, Pamela A.
Description:	96 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Charles D. Claiborn.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-11A.
Subject:	Education, Guidance and Counseling. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3241292
ISBN:	9780542970719

Personality test interpretation and the working alliance.
Horner, Pamela A.

Personality test interpretation and the working alliance. - 96 p.

Adviser: Charles D. Claiborn.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2006.

This study investigated the impact of assessment feedback on the working alliance. The prediction of working alliance by neuroticism scores and favorability of personality test feedback was studied in a sample of 27 undergraduate students at two large universities. Participants completed the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and received interpretations of their neuroticism scores according to one of three feedback conditions: (1) favorable test feedback, (2) unfavorable test feedback, and (3) mixed (favorable and unfavorable) feedback. In a separate analysis, neuroticism and favorability of test feedback were studied as predictors of session impact, as measured by the session depth scale of the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. Contrary to expectations, neuroticism and favorability of assessment feedback were not associated with working alliance. However, a significant interaction between neuroticism and unfavorable test feedback was found. Participants higher in neuroticism in the unfavorable feedback condition had poorer working alliance scores. No interaction was found for participants in either favorable or mixed feedback conditions. This result contradicts prior research. As hypothesized, session depth was predicted by neuroticism scores, such that participants higher in neuroticism reported lower session depth than those lower in neuroticism. Finally, feedback favorability was not found to be associated with session depth and there was no interaction between neuroticism and feedback favorability.

ISBN: 9780542970719Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017740
Education, Guidance and Counseling.

Personality test interpretation and the working alliance.
LDR:02421nam 2200289 a 45 001 974182
005 20110929
008 110929s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542970719
035 $a (UMI)AAI3241292
035 $a AAI3241292
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Horner, Pamela A. $3 1298126
245 1 0 $a Personality test interpretation and the working alliance.
300 $a 96 p.
500 $a Adviser: Charles D. Claiborn.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-11, Section: A, page: 4104.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2006.
520 $a This study investigated the impact of assessment feedback on the working alliance. The prediction of working alliance by neuroticism scores and favorability of personality test feedback was studied in a sample of 27 undergraduate students at two large universities. Participants completed the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and received interpretations of their neuroticism scores according to one of three feedback conditions: (1) favorable test feedback, (2) unfavorable test feedback, and (3) mixed (favorable and unfavorable) feedback. In a separate analysis, neuroticism and favorability of test feedback were studied as predictors of session impact, as measured by the session depth scale of the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. Contrary to expectations, neuroticism and favorability of assessment feedback were not associated with working alliance. However, a significant interaction between neuroticism and unfavorable test feedback was found. Participants higher in neuroticism in the unfavorable feedback condition had poorer working alliance scores. No interaction was found for participants in either favorable or mixed feedback conditions. This result contradicts prior research. As hypothesized, session depth was predicted by neuroticism scores, such that participants higher in neuroticism reported lower session depth than those lower in neuroticism. Finally, feedback favorability was not found to be associated with session depth and there was no interaction between neuroticism and feedback favorability.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Education, Guidance and Counseling. $3 1017740
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
690 $a 0519
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0625
710 2 0 $a Arizona State University. $3 1017445
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-11A.
790 $a 0010
790 1 0 $a Claiborn, Charles D., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3241292