東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Humanitarian military intervention: ...

Chamberlain Donahoe, Eileen.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Humanitarian military intervention: The ethical imperative vs the rule of law.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Humanitarian military intervention: The ethical imperative vs the rule of law./
Author:	Chamberlain Donahoe, Eileen.
Description:	237 p.
Notes:	Adviser: William O'Neill.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-06A.
Subject:	Law. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3220851
ISBN:	9780542736674

Humanitarian military intervention: The ethical imperative vs the rule of law.
Chamberlain Donahoe, Eileen.

Humanitarian military intervention: The ethical imperative vs the rule of law. - 237 p.

Adviser: William O'Neill.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Graduate Theological Union, 2006.

This dissertation argues that the existing disjunction between ethical and legal justifications for humanitarian military intervention undermines the international rule of law with respect to use of force and negatively impacts the efficacy and consistency of humanitarian military policy. The cause of the this disjunction is located in the unfortunate influence of analytic positivism as the dominant jurisprudential school of thought in the 19 th and 20th centuries, and the implicit and explicit incorporation of positivist assumptions about sovereign consent as the essence of law in the UN Charter. As a solution to this problem, it is recommended that positivism be dislodged from its position of prominence as an analytic tool for explaining international law with respect to humanitarian military intervention and replaced with a conceptualization of legality as inherently tied to ethical and humanitarian considerations. Second, it is suggested that a new international rule of law on humanitarian military intervention be codified, so that the basis of Security Council authorization is clarified. More specifically, it is recommended that the definition of conditional sovereignty be codified, and that humanitarian atrocities with no trans-national or trans-boundary implications be deemed sufficient to trigger Security Council consideration under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. In addition, an explicit ethical/pragmatic basis for Security Council authorization of humanitarian use of force should be codified.

ISBN: 9780542736674Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Humanitarian military intervention: The ethical imperative vs the rule of law.
LDR:02454nam 2200301 a 45 001 972216
005 20110927
008 110927s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542736674
035 $a (UMI)AAI3220851
035 $a AAI3220851
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Chamberlain Donahoe, Eileen. $3 1296232
245 1 0 $a Humanitarian military intervention: The ethical imperative vs the rule of law.
300 $a 237 p.
500 $a Adviser: William O'Neill.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-06, Section: A, page: 2298.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Graduate Theological Union, 2006.
520 $a This dissertation argues that the existing disjunction between ethical and legal justifications for humanitarian military intervention undermines the international rule of law with respect to use of force and negatively impacts the efficacy and consistency of humanitarian military policy. The cause of the this disjunction is located in the unfortunate influence of analytic positivism as the dominant jurisprudential school of thought in the 19 th and 20th centuries, and the implicit and explicit incorporation of positivist assumptions about sovereign consent as the essence of law in the UN Charter. As a solution to this problem, it is recommended that positivism be dislodged from its position of prominence as an analytic tool for explaining international law with respect to humanitarian military intervention and replaced with a conceptualization of legality as inherently tied to ethical and humanitarian considerations. Second, it is suggested that a new international rule of law on humanitarian military intervention be codified, so that the basis of Security Council authorization is clarified. More specifically, it is recommended that the definition of conditional sovereignty be codified, and that humanitarian atrocities with no trans-national or trans-boundary implications be deemed sufficient to trigger Security Council consideration under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. In addition, an explicit ethical/pragmatic basis for Security Council authorization of humanitarian use of force should be codified.
590 $a School code: 0080.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Military Studies. $3 1017606
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0750
710 2 0 $a Graduate Theological Union. $3 1024972
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-06A.
790 $a 0080
790 1 0 $a O'Neill, William, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3220851