東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

In defense of the state: Carl Schmit...

Koon, Scott Ross.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

In defense of the state: Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism as the ideology of civil society.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	In defense of the state: Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism as the ideology of civil society./
作者:	Koon, Scott Ross.
面頁冊數:	249 p.
附註:	Adviser: John T. Scott.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-02A.
標題:	History, Modern. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3203582
ISBN:	9780542521362

In defense of the state: Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism as the ideology of civil society.
Koon, Scott Ross.

In defense of the state: Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism as the ideology of civil society. - 249 p.

Adviser: John T. Scott.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2005.

Carl Schmitt's Weimar era critique of liberalism and democracy has been hailed as original and significant for contemporary political theory, yet Schmitt operated within a historical, political and cultural context very different from our own. I argue that Schmitt is best understood within the context of German historicism, and that his political philosophy is motivated by concerns he shares in common with the nineteenth century German conservative historicism of the sort best represented by the political works of Heinrich von Treitschke. Though reacting to different events, both seek to preserve the status of the state as a force standing over civil society. Both react to the advance of what might be regarded as the ideology of modern civil society, i.e., liberalism, economics, and the politics of the rational, self-interested individual. I will attempt to show that the themes of war, duty and power are central to Schmitt's political philosophy, and that these are borrowings from the German tradition of conservatism typified by the work of Treitschke. In an effort to preserve what he saw as valuable in the German tradition of the state against the encroachment of civil society, Schmitt placed a strong emphasis on war as a firm basis for the state's right to demand obedience from its subjects, and strove to increase the power of the state to overcome what he saw as the centrifugal forces of civil society. Schmitt specifically denies that liberalism is a political doctrine: although Schmitt does not call liberalism the ideology of civil society, he presents it as such, and offers his own, unambiguously "political" theory as an alternative. In seeking to reinforce the power of the state while diminishing the role of civil society in politics, Schmitt relies greatly on the application of an older critique of bourgeois civil society to the political theory of liberalism.

ISBN: 9780542521362Subjects--Topical Terms:

516334
History, Modern.

In defense of the state: Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism as the ideology of civil society.
LDR:02825nam 2200289 a 45 001 972159
005 20110927
008 110927s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542521362
035 $a (UMI)AAI3203582
035 $a AAI3203582
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Koon, Scott Ross. $3 1296176
245 1 0 $a In defense of the state: Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism as the ideology of civil society.
300 $a 249 p.
500 $a Adviser: John T. Scott.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-02, Section: A, page: 0704.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2005.
520 $a Carl Schmitt's Weimar era critique of liberalism and democracy has been hailed as original and significant for contemporary political theory, yet Schmitt operated within a historical, political and cultural context very different from our own. I argue that Schmitt is best understood within the context of German historicism, and that his political philosophy is motivated by concerns he shares in common with the nineteenth century German conservative historicism of the sort best represented by the political works of Heinrich von Treitschke. Though reacting to different events, both seek to preserve the status of the state as a force standing over civil society. Both react to the advance of what might be regarded as the ideology of modern civil society, i.e., liberalism, economics, and the politics of the rational, self-interested individual. I will attempt to show that the themes of war, duty and power are central to Schmitt's political philosophy, and that these are borrowings from the German tradition of conservatism typified by the work of Treitschke. In an effort to preserve what he saw as valuable in the German tradition of the state against the encroachment of civil society, Schmitt placed a strong emphasis on war as a firm basis for the state's right to demand obedience from its subjects, and strove to increase the power of the state to overcome what he saw as the centrifugal forces of civil society. Schmitt specifically denies that liberalism is a political doctrine: although Schmitt does not call liberalism the ideology of civil society, he presents it as such, and offers his own, unambiguously "political" theory as an alternative. In seeking to reinforce the power of the state while diminishing the role of civil society in politics, Schmitt relies greatly on the application of an older critique of bourgeois civil society to the political theory of liberalism.
590 $a School code: 0029.
650 4 $a History, Modern. $3 516334
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0582
690 $a 0615
710 2 0 $a University of California, Davis. $3 1018682
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-02A.
790 $a 0029
790 1 0 $a Scott, John T., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3203582