東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Rationalization, legitimation, and d...

Pasdermajian, Penny.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Rationalization, legitimation, and domination in modern industrial societies: The alternative perspectives of Max Weber and Juergen Habermas.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rationalization, legitimation, and domination in modern industrial societies: The alternative perspectives of Max Weber and Juergen Habermas./
作者:	Pasdermajian, Penny.
面頁冊數:	214 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2410.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-06A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR04071
ISBN:	9780494040713

Rationalization, legitimation, and domination in modern industrial societies: The alternative perspectives of Max Weber and Juergen Habermas.
Pasdermajian, Penny.

Rationalization, legitimation, and domination in modern industrial societies: The alternative perspectives of Max Weber and Juergen Habermas. - 214 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2410.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Concordia University (Canada), 2005.

The suggestions which Max Weber and Jurgen Habermas offer to ameliorate the moral, ethical and practical problems which society faces in modernity are quite different, but they nevertheless complement each other to some extent.

ISBN: 9780494040713Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Rationalization, legitimation, and domination in modern industrial societies: The alternative perspectives of Max Weber and Juergen Habermas.
LDR:03017nam 2200301 a 45 001 972091
005 20110927
008 110927s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780494040713
035 $a (UMI)AAINR04071
035 $a AAINR04071
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Pasdermajian, Penny. $3 1296111
245 1 0 $a Rationalization, legitimation, and domination in modern industrial societies: The alternative perspectives of Max Weber and Juergen Habermas.
300 $a 214 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2410.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Concordia University (Canada), 2005.
520 $a The suggestions which Max Weber and Jurgen Habermas offer to ameliorate the moral, ethical and practical problems which society faces in modernity are quite different, but they nevertheless complement each other to some extent.
520 $a This thesis will explore their differing approaches, and attempt to evaluate and critique both Habermas's evolutionary model of social change and Weber's "open-ended" view of modernity.
520 $a The cornerstone of Habermas's project is the assumption that as individuals learn, so do societies. In his view, learning involves a growing ability to reflect, to analyze, and to enter into the life-worlds of others. By engaging in discursive argumentation, participants subject their most cherished beliefs to close scrutiny, which Habermas hopes will result in new, intersubjectively constituted values which may provide a catalyst for change and liberation.
520 $a In contrast, Weber's project forcefully rejects evolutionary models of social change. As Weber sees it, reality is infinitely complex, fluid and unpredictable. The constant conflict between competing "value-spheres" as well makes it impossible to specify the direction of social change. Weber would also point out that Habermas's theory is crippled by the "ontogenetic fallacy" embedded in even the most sophisticated evolutionary schemes. I will thus argue (following Weber) that Habermas's guiding assumption---that as individuals learn, societies "learn"---cannot be empirically demonstrated. Weber would remind us that any recognition of the complexity of reality renders such a position untenable.
520 $a Weber offers no specific program designed to accomplish the goal of structural change and emancipation in modernity. However, in his view the plebiscitarian leader may offer a partial antidote to the often repressive forces of rationalization. Weber is also alive to the possibility that as instrumental rationality advances, it may be counterbalanced by value-rationality in various forms---for example, embodied in new social movements, or even a personal commitment to values on the part of individuals.
590 $a School code: 0228.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0422
710 2 0 $a Concordia University (Canada). $3 1018569
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-06A.
790 $a 0228
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR04071