東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Grammaticality, acceptability and se...

Braze, Forrest David.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Grammaticality, acceptability and sentence processing: A psycholinguistic study.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Grammaticality, acceptability and sentence processing: A psycholinguistic study./
作者:	Braze, Forrest David.
面頁冊數:	143 p.
附註:	Adviser: Diane Lillo-Martin.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-08A.
標題:	Language, Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3062071
ISBN:	9780493780061

Grammaticality, acceptability and sentence processing: A psycholinguistic study.
Braze, Forrest David.

Grammaticality, acceptability and sentence processing: A psycholinguistic study. - 143 p.

Adviser: Diane Lillo-Martin.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Connecticut, 2002.

Linguistic theory is built on an empirical foundation consisting largely of sentence acceptability judgments, deemed to reflect underlying grammaticality. This thesis focuses on extra-grammatical influences that sometimes obscure such judgments. For example, processing resource limitations may lead a perceiver to reject a grammatical sentence because its constituents cannot easily be recognized. Further, extra-linguistic processes may influence sentence ratings due to the analytic nature of the judgment task. Thus, In order for the researcher to accurately delineate the boundary between grammatical and ungrammatical sentences it is necessary to identify and evaluate non-grammatical influences that muddy acceptability judgments.

ISBN: 9780493780061Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018079
Language, Linguistics.

Grammaticality, acceptability and sentence processing: A psycholinguistic study.
LDR:03474nam 2200325 a 45 001 970394
005 20110921
008 110921s2002 eng d
020 $a 9780493780061
035 $a (UMI)AAI3062071
035 $a AAI3062071
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Braze, Forrest David. $3 1294432
245 1 0 $a Grammaticality, acceptability and sentence processing: A psycholinguistic study.
300 $a 143 p.
500 $a Adviser: Diane Lillo-Martin.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-08, Section: A, page: 2852.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Connecticut, 2002.
520 $a Linguistic theory is built on an empirical foundation consisting largely of sentence acceptability judgments, deemed to reflect underlying grammaticality. This thesis focuses on extra-grammatical influences that sometimes obscure such judgments. For example, processing resource limitations may lead a perceiver to reject a grammatical sentence because its constituents cannot easily be recognized. Further, extra-linguistic processes may influence sentence ratings due to the analytic nature of the judgment task. Thus, In order for the researcher to accurately delineate the boundary between grammatical and ungrammatical sentences it is necessary to identify and evaluate non-grammatical influences that muddy acceptability judgments.
520 $a Three experiments, exploiting the technique of monitoring eye-movements during reading, probe readers' responses to various classes of unacceptable sentences. This technique was chosen because eye-movements serve as a rich source of information about how sentence features are assimilated as they unfold in time. The Referential Model of the human sentence processor (HSP) serves as a theoretical framework for interpreting results, paying careful attention both to computational devices and the resources available to them.
520 $a Experiments 1 and 2 contrast ungrammatical sentences, containing morpho-syntactic anomalies, with others that are grammatical, yet pragmatically anomalous. The results illustrate that eye-movements are sensitive to constraints invoked by a range of morpho-syntactic and pragmatic anomalies, and that responses to the two classes of anomaly are distinct. These findings are argued to support a model of HSP that engages distinct devices in response to each class of anomalous sentence.
520 $a Experiment 3 examines the status of constraints on long-distance syntactic movement. Judgment satiation is a phenomenon in which some, but not all, classes of initially unacceptable sentences are judged increasingly acceptable with additional exposure. This study uncovers an on-line counterpart to judgment satiation, where the effort expended in processing (satiable) wh-island violations increases with repeated exposure. No such increase is seen in the case of (non-satiable) adjunct island violations. The initial unacceptability of wh-island violations is argued to stem from a processing resource limitation, while the satiation effect derives from the HSP's ability to dynamically shift resources to meet the moment-by-moment needs of its sub-components.
590 $a School code: 0056.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0633
710 2 0 $a University of Connecticut. $3 1017435
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-08A.
790 $a 0056
790 1 0 $a Lillo-Martin, Diane, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3062071