東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The validity and sensitivity of the ...

Baffige, Frank N.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The validity and sensitivity of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The validity and sensitivity of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale./
作者:	Baffige, Frank N.
面頁冊數:	77 p.
附註:	Adviser: AnnMarie Murphy.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-01B.
標題:	Psychology, Clinical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3206581
ISBN:	9780542525711

The validity and sensitivity of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale.
Baffige, Frank N.

The validity and sensitivity of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale. - 77 p.

Adviser: AnnMarie Murphy.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2006.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the Basis-32's validity and sensitivity to change among people suffering from major depression treated at three different levels of mental health care. A total of 30 voluntary participants ranging from ages 21 to 62 completed the admission and discharge administrations of the Behavioral and Symptom Identification Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Repeated measurements methodology (pre-post A/B) was utilized to examine changes across levels of care on the BDI-II and Basis-32. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing the Basis-32 scores to the BDI-II across time and across three levels of care. Sensitivity to change was assessed by comparing scores of all participants (all levels of care) to determine if the Basis-32 can detect clinically significant change. A one-way Analysis of Variance was conducted to examine the effects of the level of care on both Basis-32 and BDI-II scores. Results indicated that there were no significant differences among levels of care on the Basis-32 at admission but at discharge differences were significant. Thus, evidence that the Basis -32 could separate levels of care at baseline was not provided. However, there was evidence at discharge that the Basis-32 distinguished the levels of care. This raises several questions regarding patient placement. Patients at discharge had significantly lower scores than at admission; scores declined by an average of 0.56 points (sd = 0.84) demonstrating sensitivity (t = 3.61, p = .011). Concurrent validity was demonstrated: total scores on the Basis-32 and the BDI-II positively correlated with each other at a both admission and discharge. The results of this study support the previous research in terms of sensitivity and validity in outpatient and in inpatient settings. Additionally, this research has provided preliminary evidence that the Basis-32 can be utilized with differing types of outpatient treatments, diverse payer mixes and, with varied ethnic populations. Further research is encouraged to validate the Basis-32 with other psychometrically sound measures with proven cross cultural validity and reliability.

ISBN: 9780542525711Subjects--Topical Terms:

524864
Psychology, Clinical.

The validity and sensitivity of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale.
LDR:03057nam 2200277 a 45 001 969896
005 20110920
008 110921s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542525711
035 $a (UnM)AAI3206581
035 $a AAI3206581
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Baffige, Frank N. $3 1293952
245 1 4 $a The validity and sensitivity of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale.
300 $a 77 p.
500 $a Adviser: AnnMarie Murphy.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: B, page: 0529.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2006.
520 $a The purpose of the present study was to investigate the Basis-32's validity and sensitivity to change among people suffering from major depression treated at three different levels of mental health care. A total of 30 voluntary participants ranging from ages 21 to 62 completed the admission and discharge administrations of the Behavioral and Symptom Identification Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Repeated measurements methodology (pre-post A/B) was utilized to examine changes across levels of care on the BDI-II and Basis-32. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing the Basis-32 scores to the BDI-II across time and across three levels of care. Sensitivity to change was assessed by comparing scores of all participants (all levels of care) to determine if the Basis-32 can detect clinically significant change. A one-way Analysis of Variance was conducted to examine the effects of the level of care on both Basis-32 and BDI-II scores. Results indicated that there were no significant differences among levels of care on the Basis-32 at admission but at discharge differences were significant. Thus, evidence that the Basis -32 could separate levels of care at baseline was not provided. However, there was evidence at discharge that the Basis-32 distinguished the levels of care. This raises several questions regarding patient placement. Patients at discharge had significantly lower scores than at admission; scores declined by an average of 0.56 points (sd = 0.84) demonstrating sensitivity (t = 3.61, p = .011). Concurrent validity was demonstrated: total scores on the Basis-32 and the BDI-II positively correlated with each other at a both admission and discharge. The results of this study support the previous research in terms of sensitivity and validity in outpatient and in inpatient settings. Additionally, this research has provided preliminary evidence that the Basis-32 can be utilized with differing types of outpatient treatments, diverse payer mixes and, with varied ethnic populations. Further research is encouraged to validate the Basis-32 with other psychometrically sound measures with proven cross cultural validity and reliability.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a Capella University. $3 1017687
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-01B.
790 $a 1351
790 1 0 $a Murphy, AnnMarie, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3206581