東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A validation study of the Profession...

Kang, Yunjung.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A validation study of the Professional Role Orientation Inventory (PROI).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A validation study of the Professional Role Orientation Inventory (PROI)./
作者:	Kang, Yunjung.
面頁冊數:	73 p.
附註:	Co-Advisers: Geoffrey M. Maruyama; Muriel J. Bebeau.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-12A.
標題:	Education, Educational Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3198103
ISBN:	9780542438325

A validation study of the Professional Role Orientation Inventory (PROI).
Kang, Yunjung.

A validation study of the Professional Role Orientation Inventory (PROI). - 73 p.

Co-Advisers: Geoffrey M. Maruyama; Muriel J. Bebeau.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2005.

This study was designed to further refine the theoretical underpinnings of the Autonomy and Agency dimensions of the Professional Role Orientation Inventory (PROI) and to test additional items with practicing professionals. The rationale for refinement was based on (a) previous PROI studies, suggesting that a five factor structure rather than the originally proposed four factor structure (Authority, Responsibility, Autonomy and Agency) represented a better fit to the data---especially for practicing professionals, and (b) recent studies in the psychological literature (e.g., Spittal et al., 2002) suggesting the Autonomy and Agency dimensions might be better represented by three factors (Personal Efficacy, Interpersonal Effectiveness, and Sociopolitical Management). Consequently, new definitions and new items were proposed for testing. A 93-item PROI (R-PROI) was sent to 2002 active members of the American College of Dentists (ACD), selected randomly from the ACD database. Based on 1167 responses, the reliability and the factor structure of the R-PROI was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The R-PROI was moderately reliable ( a = .88), but the five factor structure of the R-PROI produced goodness-of-fit indexes indicating that the model leaves unexplained a substantial amount of the variability in the data. The next step is to test the R-PROI with a more diverse sample of professionals and students.

ISBN: 9780542438325Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017560
Education, Educational Psychology.

A validation study of the Professional Role Orientation Inventory (PROI).
LDR:02391nam 2200289 a 45 001 969873
005 20110920
008 110921s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542438325
035 $a (UnM)AAI3198103
035 $a AAI3198103
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Kang, Yunjung. $3 1293929
245 1 2 $a A validation study of the Professional Role Orientation Inventory (PROI).
300 $a 73 p.
500 $a Co-Advisers: Geoffrey M. Maruyama; Muriel J. Bebeau.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: A, page: 4297.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2005.
520 $a This study was designed to further refine the theoretical underpinnings of the Autonomy and Agency dimensions of the Professional Role Orientation Inventory (PROI) and to test additional items with practicing professionals. The rationale for refinement was based on (a) previous PROI studies, suggesting that a five factor structure rather than the originally proposed four factor structure (Authority, Responsibility, Autonomy and Agency) represented a better fit to the data---especially for practicing professionals, and (b) recent studies in the psychological literature (e.g., Spittal et al., 2002) suggesting the Autonomy and Agency dimensions might be better represented by three factors (Personal Efficacy, Interpersonal Effectiveness, and Sociopolitical Management). Consequently, new definitions and new items were proposed for testing. A 93-item PROI (R-PROI) was sent to 2002 active members of the American College of Dentists (ACD), selected randomly from the ACD database. Based on 1167 responses, the reliability and the factor structure of the R-PROI was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The R-PROI was moderately reliable ( a = .88), but the five factor structure of the R-PROI produced goodness-of-fit indexes indicating that the model leaves unexplained a substantial amount of the variability in the data. The next step is to test the R-PROI with a more diverse sample of professionals and students.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a University of Minnesota. $3 676231
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-12A.
790 $a 0130
790 1 0 $a Bebeau, Muriel J., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Maruyama, Geoffrey M., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3198103