東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Assessing unidimensionality of psych...

Slocum, Suzanne Lynn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Assessing unidimensionality of psychological scales: Using individual and integrative criteria from factor analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Assessing unidimensionality of psychological scales: Using individual and integrative criteria from factor analysis./
作者:	Slocum, Suzanne Lynn.
面頁冊數:	205 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: A, page: 4301.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-12A.
標題:	Psychology, Psychometrics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR10568
ISBN:	9780494105689

Assessing unidimensionality of psychological scales: Using individual and integrative criteria from factor analysis.
Slocum, Suzanne Lynn.

Assessing unidimensionality of psychological scales: Using individual and integrative criteria from factor analysis. - 205 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: A, page: 4301.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of British Columbia (Canada), 2005.

Whenever one uses a composite scale score from item responses, one is tacitly assuming that the scale is dominantly unidimensional. Investigating the unidimensionality of item response data is an essential component of construct validity. Yet, there is no universally accepted technique or set of rules to determine the number of factors to retain when assessing the dimensionality of item response data. Typically factor analysis is used with the eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule, the ratio of first-to-second eigenvalues, parallel analysis (PA), root-mean-square-error-of-approximation (RMSEA), or hypothesis testing approaches involving chi-square tests from Maximum Likelihood (ML) or Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimation. The purpose of this study was to investigate how these various procedures perform individually and in combination when assessing the unidimensionality of item response data via a computer simulated design. Conditions such as sample size, magnitude of communality, distribution of item responses, proportion of communality on second factor, and the number of items with non-zero loadings on the second factor were varied. Results indicate that there was no one individual decision-making method that identified undimensionality under all conditions manipulated. All individual decision-making methods failed to detect unidimensionality for the case where sample size was small, magnitude of communality was low, and item distributions were skewed. In addition, combination methods performed better than any one individual decision-making rule in certain sets of conditions. A set of guidelines and a new statistical methodology are provided for researchers. A future program of research is also illustrated.

ISBN: 9780494105689Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017742
Psychology, Psychometrics.

Assessing unidimensionality of psychological scales: Using individual and integrative criteria from factor analysis.
LDR:02596nam 2200253 a 45 001 969872
005 20110920
008 110921s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780494105689
035 $a (UnM)AAINR10568
035 $a AAINR10568
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Slocum, Suzanne Lynn. $3 1293928
245 1 0 $a Assessing unidimensionality of psychological scales: Using individual and integrative criteria from factor analysis.
300 $a 205 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: A, page: 4301.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of British Columbia (Canada), 2005.
520 $a Whenever one uses a composite scale score from item responses, one is tacitly assuming that the scale is dominantly unidimensional. Investigating the unidimensionality of item response data is an essential component of construct validity. Yet, there is no universally accepted technique or set of rules to determine the number of factors to retain when assessing the dimensionality of item response data. Typically factor analysis is used with the eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule, the ratio of first-to-second eigenvalues, parallel analysis (PA), root-mean-square-error-of-approximation (RMSEA), or hypothesis testing approaches involving chi-square tests from Maximum Likelihood (ML) or Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimation. The purpose of this study was to investigate how these various procedures perform individually and in combination when assessing the unidimensionality of item response data via a computer simulated design. Conditions such as sample size, magnitude of communality, distribution of item responses, proportion of communality on second factor, and the number of items with non-zero loadings on the second factor were varied. Results indicate that there was no one individual decision-making method that identified undimensionality under all conditions manipulated. All individual decision-making methods failed to detect unidimensionality for the case where sample size was small, magnitude of communality was low, and item distributions were skewed. In addition, combination methods performed better than any one individual decision-making rule in certain sets of conditions. A set of guidelines and a new statistical methodology are provided for researchers. A future program of research is also illustrated.
590 $a School code: 2500.
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a The University of British Columbia (Canada). $3 626643
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-12A.
790 $a 2500
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR10568