語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The Ways of Coping Questionnaire: A ...
~
Rexrode, Kathryn R.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The Ways of Coping Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The Ways of Coping Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study./
作者:
Rexrode, Kathryn R.
面頁冊數:
207 p.
附註:
Chair: Suni Petersen.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International66-06B.
標題:
Psychology, Clinical. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3178828
ISBN:
9780542187698
The Ways of Coping Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study.
Rexrode, Kathryn R.
The Ways of Coping Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study.
- 207 p.
Chair: Suni Petersen.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 2005.
Reliability generalization is a method used to depict mean measurement error variances and the causes of such score error variance across studies (Vacha-Haase, 1998). It is used to identify (a) the variability in reliability estimates for an instrument across studies, (b) the typical score reliability for an instrument, and (c) the salient features across studies that affect the variability in reliability estimate scores. A reliability generalization study is unique in that it identifies how and why score reliability varies for a particular instrument. The purpose of this correlational study was to identify variables that contribute to the reliability of scores on the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Even though this measure has been criticized for not producing reliable scores, it continues to be used frequently in coping research. This study sought to rectify this problem by gathering all of the studies using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WOCQ) and identifying variables that contribute to the variance in score reliability so that researchers can use the measure in a way that produces reliable scores. The results of this study found that the range of reliability coefficient alphas varied significantly among the WOCQ subscales. The Positive Reappraisal subscale had the least amount of variability while the Self-Controlling subscale had the largest amount of variability. Typical reliability scores for the subscales ranged from 0.60 (Confrontive Coping) to 0.75 (Positive Reappraisal). Three regression equations were significant for the Escape-Avoidance, the Positive Reappraisal, and the Self-Controlling subscales. Significant predictors varied across subscales. Source (adults versus other age groups) and format (self-report versus interview) were significant predictors for the Escape-Avoidance subscale. Source was a significant predictor for the Positive Reappraisal and Self-Controlling subscales. Format was a significant predictor for the Seeking Social Support subscale. The results of this study suggest that there are specific steps researchers can take to improve the reliability of scores they obtain when using the WOCQ.
ISBN: 9780542187698Subjects--Topical Terms:
524864
Psychology, Clinical.
The Ways of Coping Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study.
LDR
:03022nam 2200277 a 45
001
969813
005
20110920
008
110921s2005 eng d
020
$a
9780542187698
035
$a
(UnM)AAI3178828
035
$a
AAI3178828
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
Rexrode, Kathryn R.
$3
1293870
245
1 4
$a
The Ways of Coping Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study.
300
$a
207 p.
500
$a
Chair: Suni Petersen.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3424.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 2005.
520
$a
Reliability generalization is a method used to depict mean measurement error variances and the causes of such score error variance across studies (Vacha-Haase, 1998). It is used to identify (a) the variability in reliability estimates for an instrument across studies, (b) the typical score reliability for an instrument, and (c) the salient features across studies that affect the variability in reliability estimate scores. A reliability generalization study is unique in that it identifies how and why score reliability varies for a particular instrument. The purpose of this correlational study was to identify variables that contribute to the reliability of scores on the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Even though this measure has been criticized for not producing reliable scores, it continues to be used frequently in coping research. This study sought to rectify this problem by gathering all of the studies using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WOCQ) and identifying variables that contribute to the variance in score reliability so that researchers can use the measure in a way that produces reliable scores. The results of this study found that the range of reliability coefficient alphas varied significantly among the WOCQ subscales. The Positive Reappraisal subscale had the least amount of variability while the Self-Controlling subscale had the largest amount of variability. Typical reliability scores for the subscales ranged from 0.60 (Confrontive Coping) to 0.75 (Positive Reappraisal). Three regression equations were significant for the Escape-Avoidance, the Positive Reappraisal, and the Self-Controlling subscales. Significant predictors varied across subscales. Source (adults versus other age groups) and format (self-report versus interview) were significant predictors for the Escape-Avoidance subscale. Source was a significant predictor for the Positive Reappraisal and Self-Controlling subscales. Format was a significant predictor for the Seeking Social Support subscale. The results of this study suggest that there are specific steps researchers can take to improve the reliability of scores they obtain when using the WOCQ.
590
$a
School code: 0225.
650
4
$a
Psychology, Clinical.
$3
524864
650
4
$a
Psychology, Psychometrics.
$3
1017742
690
$a
0622
690
$a
0632
710
2 0
$a
Temple University.
$3
959342
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
66-06B.
790
$a
0225
790
1 0
$a
Petersen, Suni,
$e
advisor
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2005
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3178828
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9128301
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB W9128301
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入