東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The other side of shame.

Votaw-Loux, Elizabeth Rae.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The other side of shame.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The other side of shame./
作者:	Votaw-Loux, Elizabeth Rae.
面頁冊數:	85 p.
附註:	Adviser: Mark H. Stone.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-01B.
標題:	Psychology, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3159665
ISBN:	9780496926404

The other side of shame.
Votaw-Loux, Elizabeth Rae.

The other side of shame. - 85 p.

Adviser: Mark H. Stone.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Adler School of Professional Psychology, 2005.

This study was designed to assess the validity and reliability of a new instrument, the Measure of Discretion Shame (Votaw, 2004). The measure was an initial attempt to design an instrument to measure what Carl D. Schneider (1977) labeled "discretion-shame." Discretion-shame is shame felt before an event and is hypothesized to prompt an individual to protect ones own privacy, behave in coherence with social norms and values, and realize ones own limits. It is distinguished from "disgrace-shame" in that disgrace-shame is felt after an event or action, and from "trait shame" which is the result of chronic disgrace and/or humiliation leading to pathological changes in functioning. Subjects (N = 81) were asked to complete the Measure of Discretion Shame (MODS) and the Shame Disclosure Scale (Stone, 1988) in an observed setting. The Shame Disclosure Scale (SDS) is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring "disgrace shame" or trait shame and provided comparison data for assessing construct validity. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine the internal consistency reliability of the MODS. Pearson s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the linear association between the 4 scales (the MODS totals, the 2 MODS subscales, and the SDS). The MODS was found to have high internal consistency reliability (0.861). Correlations for the MODS with the SDS suggest moderate construct validity, for example: (a) MODS Total Scale scores and the SDS total scores (r = 0.391, P = 0.01; r 2 = 0.23) (b) MODS Discretion-shame subscale scores and the SDS total scores (r = 0.48, P < 0.0001; r2 = 0.23). Additional research is suggested to conduct more comprehensive assessment of the validity and reliability of the MODS and to assess its cultural limitations.

ISBN: 9780496926404Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018034
Psychology, General.

The other side of shame.
LDR:02631nam 2200289 a 45 001 969766
005 20110920
008 110921s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780496926404
035 $a (UnM)AAI3159665
035 $a AAI3159665
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Votaw-Loux, Elizabeth Rae. $3 1293824
245 1 4 $a The other side of shame.
300 $a 85 p.
500 $a Adviser: Mark H. Stone.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: B, page: 0535.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Adler School of Professional Psychology, 2005.
520 $a This study was designed to assess the validity and reliability of a new instrument, the Measure of Discretion Shame (Votaw, 2004). The measure was an initial attempt to design an instrument to measure what Carl D. Schneider (1977) labeled "discretion-shame." Discretion-shame is shame felt before an event and is hypothesized to prompt an individual to protect ones own privacy, behave in coherence with social norms and values, and realize ones own limits. It is distinguished from "disgrace-shame" in that disgrace-shame is felt after an event or action, and from "trait shame" which is the result of chronic disgrace and/or humiliation leading to pathological changes in functioning. Subjects (N = 81) were asked to complete the Measure of Discretion Shame (MODS) and the Shame Disclosure Scale (Stone, 1988) in an observed setting. The Shame Disclosure Scale (SDS) is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring "disgrace shame" or trait shame and provided comparison data for assessing construct validity. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine the internal consistency reliability of the MODS. Pearson s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the linear association between the 4 scales (the MODS totals, the 2 MODS subscales, and the SDS). The MODS was found to have high internal consistency reliability (0.861). Correlations for the MODS with the SDS suggest moderate construct validity, for example: (a) MODS Total Scale scores and the SDS total scores (r = 0.391, P = 0.01; r 2 = 0.23) (b) MODS Discretion-shame subscale scores and the SDS total scores (r = 0.48, P < 0.0001; r2 = 0.23). Additional research is suggested to conduct more comprehensive assessment of the validity and reliability of the MODS and to assess its cultural limitations.
590 $a School code: 1143.
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a Adler School of Professional Psychology. $3 1017761
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-01B.
790 $a 1143
790 1 0 $a Stone, Mark H., $e advisor
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3159665