東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The difference in trunk rotational p...

Okuda, Isao.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The difference in trunk rotational pattern, weight transfer pattern, and swing path between skilled and novice golfers.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The difference in trunk rotational pattern, weight transfer pattern, and swing path between skilled and novice golfers./
作者:	Okuda, Isao.
面頁冊數:	106 p.
附註:	Adviser: Charles A. Armstrong.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-05B.
標題:	Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3218588
ISBN:	9780542697715

The difference in trunk rotational pattern, weight transfer pattern, and swing path between skilled and novice golfers.
Okuda, Isao.

The difference in trunk rotational pattern, weight transfer pattern, and swing path between skilled and novice golfers. - 106 p.

Adviser: Charles A. Armstrong.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Toledo, 2006.

Previous studies have identified differences in selected kinematic and kinetic variables between skilled (SG) and novice (NG) golfers. However no study has examined the unique factors that may differentiate these groups in three particularly critical areas; trunk rotational patterns, weight shift pattern, and the swing path. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine specific kinematic and kinetic variables associated with these areas during a full-shot golf swing, relative to how they may differ between SG and NG Subjects included thirteen SG (23.94 +/- 3.13 yrs, average handicap = 0.80 +/- 2.55) and seventeen NG (26.31 +/- 4.89 yrs, average handicap = 30.76 +/- 5.54). Kinematic and kinetic data were obtained through high speed 3-D videography and force plates while the subject performed a full shot golf swing with a driver. Multiple trials of each golfer's swing were recorded and averaged for the analysis. Each of the selected variables was compared between the groups at eight selected temporal events using an independent T-test (significance at alpha = .05). The results indicated that critical differences existed between the groups at the back swing, initial phase of the down swing, and follow through. A trunk dominated back swing motion with a faster weight transfer pattern was evident in the SG, while the NG showed an arm dominated back swing motion with a slower weight transfer pattern. The SG initiated the down swing motion from the lower segments of the trunk with a faster weight transfer to the lead leg, while the NG initiated the down swing motion with whole trunk segments. These motion patterns appeared to significantly affect the cocking angle during the down swing. An increased anterior-posterior pelvic tilt, with a greater right-foot VGRF was evident in the SG at the follow through, while the NG showed less anterior-posterior tilting of the pelvis with a smaller right-foot VGRF. This study supported previous research on the golf swing, and provides new insight into the role of the trunk rotation and weight shift pattern in influencing the outcome of the swing.

ISBN: 9780542697715Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017756
Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery.

The difference in trunk rotational pattern, weight transfer pattern, and swing path between skilled and novice golfers.
LDR:03049nam 2200277 a 45 001 969149
005 20110920
008 110921s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542697715
035 $a (UMI)AAI3218588
035 $a AAI3218588
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Okuda, Isao. $3 1293204
245 1 4 $a The difference in trunk rotational pattern, weight transfer pattern, and swing path between skilled and novice golfers.
300 $a 106 p.
500 $a Adviser: Charles A. Armstrong.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-05, Section: B, page: 2467.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Toledo, 2006.
520 $a Previous studies have identified differences in selected kinematic and kinetic variables between skilled (SG) and novice (NG) golfers. However no study has examined the unique factors that may differentiate these groups in three particularly critical areas; trunk rotational patterns, weight shift pattern, and the swing path. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine specific kinematic and kinetic variables associated with these areas during a full-shot golf swing, relative to how they may differ between SG and NG Subjects included thirteen SG (23.94 +/- 3.13 yrs, average handicap = 0.80 +/- 2.55) and seventeen NG (26.31 +/- 4.89 yrs, average handicap = 30.76 +/- 5.54). Kinematic and kinetic data were obtained through high speed 3-D videography and force plates while the subject performed a full shot golf swing with a driver. Multiple trials of each golfer's swing were recorded and averaged for the analysis. Each of the selected variables was compared between the groups at eight selected temporal events using an independent T-test (significance at alpha = .05). The results indicated that critical differences existed between the groups at the back swing, initial phase of the down swing, and follow through. A trunk dominated back swing motion with a faster weight transfer pattern was evident in the SG, while the NG showed an arm dominated back swing motion with a slower weight transfer pattern. The SG initiated the down swing motion from the lower segments of the trunk with a faster weight transfer to the lead leg, while the NG initiated the down swing motion with whole trunk segments. These motion patterns appeared to significantly affect the cocking angle during the down swing. An increased anterior-posterior pelvic tilt, with a greater right-foot VGRF was evident in the SG at the follow through, while the NG showed less anterior-posterior tilting of the pelvis with a smaller right-foot VGRF. This study supported previous research on the golf swing, and provides new insight into the role of the trunk rotation and weight shift pattern in influencing the outcome of the swing.
590 $a School code: 0232.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery. $3 1017756
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Recreation. $3 1018003
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0575
710 2 0 $a The University of Toledo. $3 1023352
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-05B.
790 $a 0232
790 1 0 $a Armstrong, Charles A., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3218588