東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

California's press and Pacific expan...

Miller, Robert.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

California's press and Pacific expansion 1898--1900: Territorial annexation as a local issue.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	California's press and Pacific expansion 1898--1900: Territorial annexation as a local issue./
作者:	Miller, Robert.
面頁冊數:	159 p.
附註:	Adviser: Allison Varzally.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International44-06.
標題:	History, United States. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1435592
ISBN:	9780542670664

California's press and Pacific expansion 1898--1900: Territorial annexation as a local issue.
Miller, Robert.

California's press and Pacific expansion 1898--1900: Territorial annexation as a local issue. - 159 p.

Adviser: Allison Varzally.

Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2006.

Californians recognized America's late-nineteenth-century annexation of Pacific territories as an opportunity to expand the commercial and industrial power of their state. Consequently, proponents of expansion viewed the issue through a local lens as they desired to use the policy to give California economic independence from the eastern United States. Within the state, Northern Californians considered expansion as a defense against the erosion of their domination of the Pacific Coast. Southern Californians believed expansion would help improve their ports and rail connections, thereby giving the region greater economic freedom from both the eastern states and San Francisco. In both regions, the proponents of expansion targeted critics of annexation and the Filipinos rebelling against American authority as obstructions to California's prosperity. The state's non-traditional papers included their conception of government power in their local evaluation of expansion. Their opinions regarding expansion had a strong correlation to their view of the government's authority. Consequently, the labor press focused upon its fear of a strong central government in addition to its worries about Asian workers. The agricultural press, on the other hand, saw benefits to expansion, as it considered such a policy as a means to encourage the government to carry out desired actions such as the construction and ownership of the Nicaragua Canal and the regulation of plants imported into California.

ISBN: 9780542670664Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017393
History, United States.

California's press and Pacific expansion 1898--1900: Territorial annexation as a local issue.
LDR:02370nam 2200265 a 45 001 968247
005 20110915
008 110915s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542670664
035 $a (UMI)AAI1435592
035 $a AAI1435592
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Miller, Robert. $3 1292104
245 1 0 $a California's press and Pacific expansion 1898--1900: Territorial annexation as a local issue.
300 $a 159 p.
500 $a Adviser: Allison Varzally.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-06, page: 2609.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2006.
520 $a Californians recognized America's late-nineteenth-century annexation of Pacific territories as an opportunity to expand the commercial and industrial power of their state. Consequently, proponents of expansion viewed the issue through a local lens as they desired to use the policy to give California economic independence from the eastern United States. Within the state, Northern Californians considered expansion as a defense against the erosion of their domination of the Pacific Coast. Southern Californians believed expansion would help improve their ports and rail connections, thereby giving the region greater economic freedom from both the eastern states and San Francisco. In both regions, the proponents of expansion targeted critics of annexation and the Filipinos rebelling against American authority as obstructions to California's prosperity. The state's non-traditional papers included their conception of government power in their local evaluation of expansion. Their opinions regarding expansion had a strong correlation to their view of the government's authority. Consequently, the labor press focused upon its fear of a strong central government in addition to its worries about Asian workers. The agricultural press, on the other hand, saw benefits to expansion, as it considered such a policy as a means to encourage the government to carry out desired actions such as the construction and ownership of the Nicaragua Canal and the regulation of plants imported into California.
590 $a School code: 6060.
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
690 $a 0337
710 2 0 $a California State University, Fullerton. $3 1017845
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 44-06.
790 $a 6060
790 1 0 $a Varzally, Allison, $e advisor
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1435592