東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Does discipline matter? Pedagogical ...

Evers, Ann.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Does discipline matter? Pedagogical approaches to critical thinking in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and economics.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Does discipline matter? Pedagogical approaches to critical thinking in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and economics./
作者:	Evers, Ann.
面頁冊數:	133 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-04, page: 1748.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International45-04.
標題:	Education, Language and Literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR23313
ISBN:	9780494233139

Does discipline matter? Pedagogical approaches to critical thinking in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and economics.
Evers, Ann.

Does discipline matter? Pedagogical approaches to critical thinking in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and economics. - 133 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-04, page: 1748.

Thesis (M.A.)--Carleton University (Canada), 2007.

Although there are many pedagogical approaches to teaching English for Academic Purposes (EAP), most share the objective of preparing second language (L2) learners to engage in academic study. One of these EAP approaches, the Sustained Content-based approach, includes the explicit teaching of critical thinking as part of course design. This study compared definitions of critical thinking across two disciplines, within: (1) a university-level EAP program that used the Sustained Content-based approach, and (2) within the same university's Economics Department. Economics was chosen as a contrast because it promotes thinking like an economist throughout its program of study and many of the EAP students planned to enroll in Economics for their degree program. In order to gain an understanding of how critical thinking is facilitated within each of these disciplines, six case studies were developed from interview and questionnaire data with three Economics professors and three EAP instructors. A mismatch was found between the discipline-specific definitions for critical thinking, calling into question whether critical thinking as operationalized within the Sustained Content-based EAP approach is useful. Results were triangulated with questionnaires from Political Science. Implications for teaching EAP and critical thinking are considered and potential program alternatives are discussed.

ISBN: 9780494233139Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018115
Education, Language and Literature.

Does discipline matter? Pedagogical approaches to critical thinking in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and economics.
LDR:02244nam 2200265 a 45 001 968094
005 20110915
008 110915s2007 eng d
020 $a 9780494233139
035 $a (UMI)AAIMR23313
035 $a AAIMR23313
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Evers, Ann. $3 1291954
245 1 0 $a Does discipline matter? Pedagogical approaches to critical thinking in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and economics.
300 $a 133 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-04, page: 1748.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Carleton University (Canada), 2007.
520 $a Although there are many pedagogical approaches to teaching English for Academic Purposes (EAP), most share the objective of preparing second language (L2) learners to engage in academic study. One of these EAP approaches, the Sustained Content-based approach, includes the explicit teaching of critical thinking as part of course design. This study compared definitions of critical thinking across two disciplines, within: (1) a university-level EAP program that used the Sustained Content-based approach, and (2) within the same university's Economics Department. Economics was chosen as a contrast because it promotes thinking like an economist throughout its program of study and many of the EAP students planned to enroll in Economics for their degree program. In order to gain an understanding of how critical thinking is facilitated within each of these disciplines, six case studies were developed from interview and questionnaire data with three Economics professors and three EAP instructors. A mismatch was found between the discipline-specific definitions for critical thinking, calling into question whether critical thinking as operationalized within the Sustained Content-based EAP approach is useful. Results were triangulated with questionnaires from Political Science. Implications for teaching EAP and critical thinking are considered and potential program alternatives are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0040.
650 4 $a Education, Language and Literature. $3 1018115
650 4 $a Education, Social Sciences. $3 1019148
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0534
710 2 0 $a Carleton University (Canada). $3 1018407
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 45-04.
790 $a 0040
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR23313