東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Evaluation of a common carp (Cyprinu...

Williams, Paul Edwin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluation of a common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) exclusion and trapping device for use in aquatic plant founder colony establishment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluation of a common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) exclusion and trapping device for use in aquatic plant founder colony establishment./
作者:	Williams, Paul Edwin.
面頁冊數:	58 p.
附註:	Adviser: Paul F. Hudak.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International47-02.
標題:	Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1458684
ISBN:	9780549792789

Evaluation of a common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) exclusion and trapping device for use in aquatic plant founder colony establishment.
Williams, Paul Edwin.

Evaluation of a common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) exclusion and trapping device for use in aquatic plant founder colony establishment. - 58 p.

Adviser: Paul F. Hudak.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of North Texas, 2008.

The focus of this study was to design and evaluate a trapping system that would reduce populations of common carp within water bodies in conjunction with establishment of native aquatic macrophytes founder colonies. A pond study and field study were conducted. A pond study was performed at the Lewisville Aquatic Ecosystem Research Facility, located in Lewisville, Texas, followed by a field study within a constructed wetland located in southern Dallas, Texas. For the pond study, twelve funnel traps were constructed (four reps of each type: control, dual-walled and ring cage). Two anti-escape devices were tested with funnels including steel fingers and hinged flaps. Ring cage and dual-walled treatments were planted using native pondweeds, while controls were left unplanted (additional bait and a drift fence scenarios were also tested). Common carp were introduced into the study pond. Chi-square statistical analyses were utilized and showed ring cage treatments using fingers as well as the use of a drift fence to be most effective. Following completion of the pond study, the two most effective treatments (controls and ring cages) were tested within the Dallas, Texas wetland; no carp were caught during the field test.

ISBN: 9780549792789Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020913
Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture.

Evaluation of a common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) exclusion and trapping device for use in aquatic plant founder colony establishment.
LDR:02139nam 2200277 a 45 001 953928
005 20110621
008 110622s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549792789
035 $a (UMI)AAI1458684
035 $a AAI1458684
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Williams, Paul Edwin. $3 1277409
245 1 0 $a Evaluation of a common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) exclusion and trapping device for use in aquatic plant founder colony establishment.
300 $a 58 p.
500 $a Adviser: Paul F. Hudak.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 47-02, page: .
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of North Texas, 2008.
520 $a The focus of this study was to design and evaluate a trapping system that would reduce populations of common carp within water bodies in conjunction with establishment of native aquatic macrophytes founder colonies. A pond study and field study were conducted. A pond study was performed at the Lewisville Aquatic Ecosystem Research Facility, located in Lewisville, Texas, followed by a field study within a constructed wetland located in southern Dallas, Texas. For the pond study, twelve funnel traps were constructed (four reps of each type: control, dual-walled and ring cage). Two anti-escape devices were tested with funnels including steel fingers and hinged flaps. Ring cage and dual-walled treatments were planted using native pondweeds, while controls were left unplanted (additional bait and a drift fence scenarios were also tested). Common carp were introduced into the study pond. Chi-square statistical analyses were utilized and showed ring cage treatments using fingers as well as the use of a drift fence to be most effective. Following completion of the pond study, the two most effective treatments (controls and ring cages) were tested within the Dallas, Texas wetland; no carp were caught during the field test.
590 $a School code: 0158.
650 4 $a Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture. $3 1020913
650 4 $a Environmental Sciences. $3 676987
690 $a 0768
690 $a 0792
710 2 $a University of North Texas. $3 1017396
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 47-02.
790 $a 0158
790 1 0 $a Hudak, Paul F., $e advisor
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1458684