東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The American moral establishment: Re...

Sehat, David.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The American moral establishment: Religion and liberalism in the nineteenth century.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The American moral establishment: Religion and liberalism in the nineteenth century./
作者:	Sehat, David.
面頁冊數:	321 p.
附註:	Adviser: John F. Kasson.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-07A.
標題:	History, United States. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3272547
ISBN:	9780549129486

The American moral establishment: Religion and liberalism in the nineteenth century.
Sehat, David.

The American moral establishment: Religion and liberalism in the nineteenth century. - 321 p.

Adviser: John F. Kasson.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007.

The relationship of religion to political governance is one of the most vexed questions in the modern world, but it is a central tenet of the American myth that the United States has solved the problem with the advent of modern religious liberty. In fact the United States maintained an established or state-supported religion through much of its history. The moral establishment moved through the proxy of laws designed, in the explanation of its proponents, to uphold public morals and good order. But the moral establishment often upheld a religiously derived morality, so although the establishment was not forthrightly a religious establishment, religious ideals still possessed the coercive power of law. Law in the nineteenth century became a way of advancing a regulatory regime that held a relative view of individual rights, rigidly subordinated to what courts thought was the good of the whole, and it was the moral establishment that prescribed the duties that citizens owed to one another and to the state. Part of that prescribed moral obligation entailed the limitation, the situational qualification, or even the flat denial of individual rights to women, Afro-Americans, and religious minorities including Catholics, Mormons, and free thinkers. Yet the paradox of the moral establishment was that as it increased its reach and attained a more-fully elaborated symbolic repertory and a finer-grained articulation of the limits of moral behavior, its proponents felt increasingly uneasy. Its growing intermediate range, neither forthrightly supporting Christianity nor effecting a complete separation of religion and government, left some proponents worried that it was a house built on sand, whose uncertain stability resulted from a lack of clear connection to what they took to be the rock bed of Christianity. Historians have typically taken religious rhetoric on face value, assuming that the decline in religious power was real, but ultimately the religious rhetoric of decline served to further consolidate the establishment's support. By the end of the nineteenth century the moral establishment was more firmly entrenched than it had been at the beginning, and religious hold on the levers of public life was tighter than ever.

ISBN: 9780549129486Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017393
History, United States.

The American moral establishment: Religion and liberalism in the nineteenth century.
LDR:03366nam 2200325 a 45 001 949593
005 20110525
008 110525s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549129486
035 $a (UMI)AAI3272547
035 $a AAI3272547
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Sehat, David. $3 1272978
245 1 4 $a The American moral establishment: Religion and liberalism in the nineteenth century.
300 $a 321 p.
500 $a Adviser: John F. Kasson.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-07, Section: A, page: 3111.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007.
520 $a The relationship of religion to political governance is one of the most vexed questions in the modern world, but it is a central tenet of the American myth that the United States has solved the problem with the advent of modern religious liberty. In fact the United States maintained an established or state-supported religion through much of its history. The moral establishment moved through the proxy of laws designed, in the explanation of its proponents, to uphold public morals and good order. But the moral establishment often upheld a religiously derived morality, so although the establishment was not forthrightly a religious establishment, religious ideals still possessed the coercive power of law. Law in the nineteenth century became a way of advancing a regulatory regime that held a relative view of individual rights, rigidly subordinated to what courts thought was the good of the whole, and it was the moral establishment that prescribed the duties that citizens owed to one another and to the state. Part of that prescribed moral obligation entailed the limitation, the situational qualification, or even the flat denial of individual rights to women, Afro-Americans, and religious minorities including Catholics, Mormons, and free thinkers. Yet the paradox of the moral establishment was that as it increased its reach and attained a more-fully elaborated symbolic repertory and a finer-grained articulation of the limits of moral behavior, its proponents felt increasingly uneasy. Its growing intermediate range, neither forthrightly supporting Christianity nor effecting a complete separation of religion and government, left some proponents worried that it was a house built on sand, whose uncertain stability resulted from a lack of clear connection to what they took to be the rock bed of Christianity. Historians have typically taken religious rhetoric on face value, assuming that the decline in religious power was real, but ultimately the religious rhetoric of decline served to further consolidate the establishment's support. By the end of the nineteenth century the moral establishment was more firmly entrenched than it had been at the beginning, and religious hold on the levers of public life was tighter than ever.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
650 4 $a Religion, History of. $3 1017471
690 $a 0320
690 $a 0337
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b History. $3 1020236
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-07A.
790 $a 0153
790 1 0 $a Brundage, W. Fitzhugh $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Filene, Peter $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Kasson, John F., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Lienesch, Michael $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Wacker, Grant $e committee member
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3272547