東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Critical pedagogy and oppositional p...

Kravatz, Tanya Devra.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Critical pedagogy and oppositional politics in education: Developing critical consciousness and building civil society in the classroom.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Critical pedagogy and oppositional politics in education: Developing critical consciousness and building civil society in the classroom./
作者:	Kravatz, Tanya Devra.
面頁冊數:	214 p.
附註:	Adviser: Hugh Mehan.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-05A.
標題:	Education, Sociology of. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3266842
ISBN:	9780549051114

Critical pedagogy and oppositional politics in education: Developing critical consciousness and building civil society in the classroom.
Kravatz, Tanya Devra.

Critical pedagogy and oppositional politics in education: Developing critical consciousness and building civil society in the classroom. - 214 p.

Adviser: Hugh Mehan.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2007.

This dissertation researches how education can help maintain democracy by enhancing civil society. Civil society is a network of autonomous organizations that prevent state domination of society. Civil society requires the participation of critically-minded individuals in civic activities. This study suggests that critical pedagogy is a teaching practice that supports the development of a vibrant civil society because it emphasizes social critique, community, resistance, and civic engagement. Furthermore, social justice schools have the capacity to be civil society organizations that temper state power even though they are not autonomous from the government; schools can be the civil society of education by preventing state domination of this institution.

ISBN: 9780549051114Subjects--Topical Terms:

626654
Education, Sociology of.

Critical pedagogy and oppositional politics in education: Developing critical consciousness and building civil society in the classroom.
LDR:03520nam 2200301 a 45 001 948988
005 20110525
008 110525s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549051114
035 $a (UMI)AAI3266842
035 $a AAI3266842
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Kravatz, Tanya Devra. $3 1272366
245 1 0 $a Critical pedagogy and oppositional politics in education: Developing critical consciousness and building civil society in the classroom.
300 $a 214 p.
500 $a Adviser: Hugh Mehan.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-05, Section: A, page: 2176.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2007.
520 $a This dissertation researches how education can help maintain democracy by enhancing civil society. Civil society is a network of autonomous organizations that prevent state domination of society. Civil society requires the participation of critically-minded individuals in civic activities. This study suggests that critical pedagogy is a teaching practice that supports the development of a vibrant civil society because it emphasizes social critique, community, resistance, and civic engagement. Furthermore, social justice schools have the capacity to be civil society organizations that temper state power even though they are not autonomous from the government; schools can be the civil society of education by preventing state domination of this institution.
520 $a Using ethnographic field methods of participant observation and interview, this study analyzes three diverse secondary schools in California as they struggle to implement social justice pedagogics like critical pedagogy and social justice praxis. As defined in this study, social justice teaching praxis fosters critical consciousness, social responsibility, identity formation, and the questioning of power in society. Social justice praxis is the culmination of three dimensions of framing social justice issues in classroom interactions. When praxis is successful, power dynamics between the teacher and the student are transcended in favor of constructing intersubjective knowledge about social justice. Such knowledge production positions students in the power structure based on their relationship to power and oppression. Framing social justice is really about positioning and repositioning students and teachers in the power structure while identifying their particular responsibilities to social justice action.
520 $a Data suggests that social justice praxis is necessary but not sufficient to engage in critical pedagogy. Students and teachers at all three schools attempt to create comprehensive social justice programs. Some of these programs facilitate critical pedagogy while others are confined to successes and failures in social justice praxis because students and/or teachers do not thoroughly question their positions in the power structure. Additional barriers to practicing critical pedagogy in classrooms include tensions between education as a mechanism for assimilation vs. transformation, school structure, pressures for standardization, the homogeneity vs. heterogeneity of the student population, teacher experience, and resistance by teachers and students.
590 $a School code: 0033.
650 4 $a Education, Sociology of. $3 626654
650 4 $a Sociology, General. $3 1017541
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a University of California, San Diego. $3 1018093
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-05A.
790 $a 0033
790 1 0 $a Mehan, Hugh, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3266842