東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A study of the measurement of wisdom...

Mehl Chadwick, Kathleen A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A study of the measurement of wisdom in the Missouri State Judiciary.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A study of the measurement of wisdom in the Missouri State Judiciary./
作者:	Mehl Chadwick, Kathleen A.
面頁冊數:	407 p.
附註:	Adviser: Nancy Longo.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-10B.
標題:	Education, Guidance and Counseling. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3283996
ISBN:	9780549275756

A study of the measurement of wisdom in the Missouri State Judiciary.
Mehl Chadwick, Kathleen A.

A study of the measurement of wisdom in the Missouri State Judiciary. - 407 p.

Adviser: Nancy Longo.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2007.

This study evaluated an existing standardized self-rating scale designed to measure affective, cognitive, and reflective indicators of wisdom through a survey of state-level jurists, an occupational group for whom wisdom has unique importance. The researcher invited the participation of all current and former members of the Missouri State Judiciary (N = 651). After determining that the 258 respondents (40%) comprised a representative sample to the extent that findings were likely to generalize meaningfully to the population, the survey data were used to evaluate the instrument. The instrument demonstrated reliability, in terms of internal consistency, and construct validity, in terms of nomological and known group validity, supporting previous evidence that the instrument measures wisdom, as defined. Within the subscales, issues of content and face validity were identified, suggesting further analyses of data might contribute to subsequent refinement of the instrument. In the demonstration of known group validity, Missouri Jurists' mean scores on each subscale and on the combined-scales overall score were found to be significantly higher than published norms on this instrument, suggesting that the instrument can distinguish a group of persons predicted by theory to be wiser than average (i.e., jurists), from a group predicted by theory to show average levels of wisdom (i.e., adults in the general population). This finding provides the first evidence, albeit preliminary, that Missouri citizens have selected persons with above average levels of wisdom to serve in their state judiciary. Given the inseparability of personal and professional development in adulthood, the findings argue for collaborative study by law and educational psychology of the measurement of wisdom as a conception of adulthood maturity with specific relevance for the judicial profession.

ISBN: 9780549275756Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017740
Education, Guidance and Counseling.

A study of the measurement of wisdom in the Missouri State Judiciary.
LDR:02908nam 2200337 a 45 001 947721
005 20110524
008 110524s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549275756
035 $a (UMI)AAI3283996
035 $a AAI3283996
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Mehl Chadwick, Kathleen A. $3 1271196
245 1 2 $a A study of the measurement of wisdom in the Missouri State Judiciary.
300 $a 407 p.
500 $a Adviser: Nancy Longo.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-10, Section: B, page: 7003.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2007.
520 $a This study evaluated an existing standardized self-rating scale designed to measure affective, cognitive, and reflective indicators of wisdom through a survey of state-level jurists, an occupational group for whom wisdom has unique importance. The researcher invited the participation of all current and former members of the Missouri State Judiciary (N = 651). After determining that the 258 respondents (40%) comprised a representative sample to the extent that findings were likely to generalize meaningfully to the population, the survey data were used to evaluate the instrument. The instrument demonstrated reliability, in terms of internal consistency, and construct validity, in terms of nomological and known group validity, supporting previous evidence that the instrument measures wisdom, as defined. Within the subscales, issues of content and face validity were identified, suggesting further analyses of data might contribute to subsequent refinement of the instrument. In the demonstration of known group validity, Missouri Jurists' mean scores on each subscale and on the combined-scales overall score were found to be significantly higher than published norms on this instrument, suggesting that the instrument can distinguish a group of persons predicted by theory to be wiser than average (i.e., jurists), from a group predicted by theory to show average levels of wisdom (i.e., adults in the general population). This finding provides the first evidence, albeit preliminary, that Missouri citizens have selected persons with above average levels of wisdom to serve in their state judiciary. Given the inseparability of personal and professional development in adulthood, the findings argue for collaborative study by law and educational psychology of the measurement of wisdom as a conception of adulthood maturity with specific relevance for the judicial profession.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Education, Guidance and Counseling. $3 1017740
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Psychology, Developmental. $3 1017557
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0519
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Psychology. $3 1018418
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-10B.
790 $a 1351
790 1 0 $a Harris, Sandra $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Longo, Nancy, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Reddout, Jeff $e committee member
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3283996