東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Personality vulnerability to depress...

Mihic, Ljiljana.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Personality vulnerability to depression and stress processes: A diary study.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Personality vulnerability to depression and stress processes: A diary study./
作者:	Mihic, Ljiljana.
面頁冊數:	239 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-09, Section: B, page: 6321.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-09B.
標題:	Psychology, Clinical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR30838
ISBN:	9780494308387

Personality vulnerability to depression and stress processes: A diary study.
Mihic, Ljiljana.

Personality vulnerability to depression and stress processes: A diary study. - 239 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-09, Section: B, page: 6321.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2007.

Keywords. Sociotropy, Need for Control, Defensive Separation, Perfectionism/Self-Criticism, stress exposure, stress reactivity, coping choice, coping effectiveness, appraisal

ISBN: 9780494308387Subjects--Topical Terms:

524864
Psychology, Clinical.

Personality vulnerability to depression and stress processes: A diary study.
LDR:04114nam 2200265 a 45 001 947702
005 20110524
008 110524s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494308387
035 $a (UMI)AAINR30838
035 $a AAINR30838
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Mihic, Ljiljana. $3 1271176
245 1 0 $a Personality vulnerability to depression and stress processes: A diary study.
300 $a 239 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-09, Section: B, page: 6321.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2007.
520 $a Keywords. Sociotropy, Need for Control, Defensive Separation, Perfectionism/Self-Criticism, stress exposure, stress reactivity, coping choice, coping effectiveness, appraisal
520 $a A two-week prospective study was conducted to test the diathesis-stress component of Beck and Blatt's theories of depression within the context of daily diary recordings. A general purpose of the study was to explore potential differences in stress processes between the personality vulnerability styles suggested by the cognitive and psychodynamic theories of depression. The cognitive set of constructs included Sociotropy and separate components of the Autonomy construct (Need for Control, Defensive Separation, and Perfectionism/Self-Criticism). Their psychodynamic counterparts were Dependency and Self-Criticism, respectively. The following stress processes were examined: stress exposure, stress reactivity, coping choice, coping effectiveness, and appraisal. University students (N=100) completed diaries at the end of every day for 14 consecutive days. Data were analysed using multilevel modeling. The stress exposure hypothesis (i.e., the hypothesis that personality contributes to increased exposure to stressors) received support for Sociotropy. This finding adds to the growing literature suggesting that this personality style creates actively ongoing difficulties of an achievement nature. The stress reactivity hypothesis (i.e., the hypothesis that personality moderates the effects of stressors on affect and cognition) was supported for Need for Control and Defensive Separation. As predicted, Need for Control conferred vulnerability to independence-restrictive or control events as opposed to failure events, and was associated with increased hostility following events impinging on one's freedom and mobility. This study additionally obtained evidence supporting a need for further refinement of the defensive separation construct. In particular, the high end of this dimension seems to confer less vulnerability to stressors of various types, whereas its low end seems to confer vulnerability to a broader range of stressors of various durations. High Defensive Separation individuals appear to possess a combination of protective and risk factors, which when combined can be embodied in a self-sufficient, indifferent type of individual. The advanced congruency hypotheses regarding coping choice and coping effectiveness received partial support in this study, suggesting that the relation between coping and personality is more complex than has been suggested by the congruency hypothesis and the differential coping choice-effectiveness hypothesis. Loss appraisals demonstrated meaningful relations to daily variations in affect and cognition, although none of the expected relations between the personality vulnerability styles and loss appraisals were supported. The psychodynamic set of constructs did not yield significant results, supporting further the idea that the personality constructs stemming from the two different traditions are not identical. Implications for both future research and clinical work are discussed. Examples of the HLM syntax used to test hypotheses regarding stress exposure, stress reactivity, coping choice, and coping effectiveness are appended.
590 $a School code: 0784.
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a The University of Western Ontario (Canada). $3 1017622
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-09B.
790 $a 0784
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR30838