東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Perfectionism: Examination from a se...

Gosselin, Jennifer Torri.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Perfectionism: Examination from a self-regulation framework.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Perfectionism: Examination from a self-regulation framework./
作者:	Gosselin, Jennifer Torri.
面頁冊數:	100 p.
附註:	Chair: James E. Maddux.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-02B.
標題:	Psychology, Personality. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3079323
ISBN:	9780496272013

Perfectionism: Examination from a self-regulation framework.
Gosselin, Jennifer Torri.

Perfectionism: Examination from a self-regulation framework. - 100 p.

Chair: James E. Maddux.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2003.

The present study examined perfectionism from a self-regulation conceptual framework. Perfectionism was defined in this study as tendencies or patterns of cognitions, emotions, and behaviors based on the beliefs that one's self worth is dependent upon "perfect" performance and that performance can be categorized only as a total success or a total failure. The present study examined how individual differences in perfectionism influence response to negative versus neutral feedback on a bogus intelligence task. Participants included 239 undergraduate and graduate students. Using the Brief Perfectionism Scale (BPS, Gosselin, Boone, Sinek, & Tangney, 2002), perfectionists were divided into High, Moderate, and Low Perfectionism groups. Participants completed a computerized bogus word task and were randomly assigned to negative or neutral feedback conditions. Participants' responses to the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS, Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) and their response to a task-specific self-efficacy item were compared at pre-task and post-task. The primary hypothesis stated that High Perfectionists would report a greater increase in negative affect and a greater decrease in self-efficacy in response to negative feedback than the other perfectionism groups. Results using a Repeated Measures MANOVA demonstrated no difference in affect between the perfectionism groups, refuting the first part of that hypothesis. Unexpectedly, the Low Perfectionism group demonstrated the greatest decrease in self-efficacy in response to negative feedback, while the High Perfectionism group did not show a significant change in self-efficacy from pre-task to post-task. The implications of these findings are discussed, including the possibility that perfectionists are more likely to attend to self-generated feedback than external feedback, as well as the possibility that perfectionists responded to the self-efficacy question in terms of setting a goal for the task, rather than reporting their beliefs about their performance abilities. Future directions for perfectionism research are discussed, including the use of experimental, rather than correlational, research to examine perfectionism, as well as cognitive, schematic, affective, and developmental aspects of perfectionism to be examined.

ISBN: 9780496272013Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017585
Psychology, Personality.

Perfectionism: Examination from a self-regulation framework.
LDR:03181nam 2200277 a 45 001 946827
005 20110523
008 110523s2003 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780496272013
035 $a (UMI)AAI3079323
035 $a AAI3079323
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Gosselin, Jennifer Torri. $3 1270243
245 1 0 $a Perfectionism: Examination from a self-regulation framework.
300 $a 100 p.
500 $a Chair: James E. Maddux.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-02, Section: B, page: 0993.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2003.
520 $a The present study examined perfectionism from a self-regulation conceptual framework. Perfectionism was defined in this study as tendencies or patterns of cognitions, emotions, and behaviors based on the beliefs that one's self worth is dependent upon "perfect" performance and that performance can be categorized only as a total success or a total failure. The present study examined how individual differences in perfectionism influence response to negative versus neutral feedback on a bogus intelligence task. Participants included 239 undergraduate and graduate students. Using the Brief Perfectionism Scale (BPS, Gosselin, Boone, Sinek, & Tangney, 2002), perfectionists were divided into High, Moderate, and Low Perfectionism groups. Participants completed a computerized bogus word task and were randomly assigned to negative or neutral feedback conditions. Participants' responses to the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS, Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) and their response to a task-specific self-efficacy item were compared at pre-task and post-task. The primary hypothesis stated that High Perfectionists would report a greater increase in negative affect and a greater decrease in self-efficacy in response to negative feedback than the other perfectionism groups. Results using a Repeated Measures MANOVA demonstrated no difference in affect between the perfectionism groups, refuting the first part of that hypothesis. Unexpectedly, the Low Perfectionism group demonstrated the greatest decrease in self-efficacy in response to negative feedback, while the High Perfectionism group did not show a significant change in self-efficacy from pre-task to post-task. The implications of these findings are discussed, including the possibility that perfectionists are more likely to attend to self-generated feedback than external feedback, as well as the possibility that perfectionists responded to the self-efficacy question in terms of setting a goal for the task, rather than reporting their beliefs about their performance abilities. Future directions for perfectionism research are discussed, including the use of experimental, rather than correlational, research to examine perfectionism, as well as cognitive, schematic, affective, and developmental aspects of perfectionism to be examined.
590 $a School code: 0883.
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a George Mason University. $3 1019450
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-02B.
790 $a 0883
790 1 0 $a Maddux, James E., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3079323