東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Semi-structured diagnostic interview...

Fredette, Melissa Kathleen.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Semi-structured diagnostic interviews and peer reports for personality disorder assessment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Semi-structured diagnostic interviews and peer reports for personality disorder assessment./
作者:	Fredette, Melissa Kathleen.
面頁冊數:	125 p.
附註:	Adviser: Eric Turkheimer.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-01B.
標題:	Psychology, Clinical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3300237
ISBN:	9780549447238

Semi-structured diagnostic interviews and peer reports for personality disorder assessment.
Fredette, Melissa Kathleen.

Semi-structured diagnostic interviews and peer reports for personality disorder assessment. - 125 p.

Adviser: Eric Turkheimer.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Virginia, 2008.

Although semi-structured diagnostic interviews of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders (PDs) are the preferred method of PD assessment, they sometimes provide an incomplete picture of a person. Many studies have documented the utility of using peer report as an alternative form of personality disorder assessment. The current study investigated whether peer-report and stranger report augmented semi-structured interview data. One hundred videotaped Structured Interview for DSM-IV-TR Personality (SIDP-IV) interviews for whom peer-nomination PD data had previously been obtained were selected. Ninety of these interviews were chosen for having elevated peer-nominated PD ratings and high diagnostic variability (low comorbidity among PD diagnoses according to peer-report). Ten were randomly selected from the remaining interviews. Each interview was rated by two Clinical Psychology doctoral candidates who had completed their Masters degree in psychology and by two undergraduates using the DSM-IV-TR Axis II features and the Five-Factor model (NEO-PI-R) of personality. Relationships among Masters-level raters' ratings, undergraduates' ratings, original peers' nominations, and SIDP-IV scores were examined. Several undergraduate and Masters-level ratings of PD features and NEO-PI-R facets predicted peer-nominated PDs after controlling for the SIDP-IV. Peers provided information that was distinct from SIDP-IV information. Results suggest that there was additional information left in the SIDP-IV interview after the structured scoring guidelines were completed. Results further suggest that it is advisable to use multiple forms of assessment when assessing personality disorders.

ISBN: 9780549447238Subjects--Topical Terms:

524864
Psychology, Clinical.

Semi-structured diagnostic interviews and peer reports for personality disorder assessment.
LDR:02580nam 2200277 a 45 001 946529
005 20110523
008 110523s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549447238
035 $a (UMI)AAI3300237
035 $a AAI3300237
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Fredette, Melissa Kathleen. $3 1269939
245 1 0 $a Semi-structured diagnostic interviews and peer reports for personality disorder assessment.
300 $a 125 p.
500 $a Adviser: Eric Turkheimer.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-01, Section: B, page: 0675.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Virginia, 2008.
520 $a Although semi-structured diagnostic interviews of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders (PDs) are the preferred method of PD assessment, they sometimes provide an incomplete picture of a person. Many studies have documented the utility of using peer report as an alternative form of personality disorder assessment. The current study investigated whether peer-report and stranger report augmented semi-structured interview data. One hundred videotaped Structured Interview for DSM-IV-TR Personality (SIDP-IV) interviews for whom peer-nomination PD data had previously been obtained were selected. Ninety of these interviews were chosen for having elevated peer-nominated PD ratings and high diagnostic variability (low comorbidity among PD diagnoses according to peer-report). Ten were randomly selected from the remaining interviews. Each interview was rated by two Clinical Psychology doctoral candidates who had completed their Masters degree in psychology and by two undergraduates using the DSM-IV-TR Axis II features and the Five-Factor model (NEO-PI-R) of personality. Relationships among Masters-level raters' ratings, undergraduates' ratings, original peers' nominations, and SIDP-IV scores were examined. Several undergraduate and Masters-level ratings of PD features and NEO-PI-R facets predicted peer-nominated PDs after controlling for the SIDP-IV. Peers provided information that was distinct from SIDP-IV information. Results suggest that there was additional information left in the SIDP-IV interview after the structured scoring guidelines were completed. Results further suggest that it is advisable to use multiple forms of assessment when assessing personality disorders.
590 $a School code: 0246.
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a University of Virginia. $3 645578
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-01B.
790 $a 0246
790 1 0 $a Turkheimer, Eric, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3300237