東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Individual-level predictors of inter...

Wolf, Scott T.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Individual-level predictors of intergroup conflict: The roles of guilt, shame and empathy.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Individual-level predictors of intergroup conflict: The roles of guilt, shame and empathy./
作者:	Wolf, Scott T.
面頁冊數:	139 p.
附註:	Adviser: Chester A. Insko.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-03B.
標題:	Psychology, Personality. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3257600

Individual-level predictors of intergroup conflict: The roles of guilt, shame and empathy.
Wolf, Scott T.

Individual-level predictors of intergroup conflict: The roles of guilt, shame and empathy. - 139 p.

Adviser: Chester A. Insko.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007.

The discontinuity effect is the tendency for intergroup interactions to be more competitive, or less cooperative, than interindividual interactions in the context of mixed-motive situations. Meta-analytic methods have shown this effect to be substantially large and robust (Wildschut, Pinter, Vevea, Insko, & Schopler, 2003). Explanations for the discontinuity effect have focused on norms, schemas, identifiability, and rationalization. Although, personality factors, in general, have received limited attention, Wildschut and Insko (2006) found that dispositional guilt of group members predicted competition in an intergroup prisoner's dilemma game (PDG) but only when group members were told that their decisions would be made public to their fellow ingroup members. The present studies sought to extend these findings by measuring guilt as well as other related personality variables (e.g., shame, empathy, and psychopathy) and assessing their relationships with intergroup competition when decisions remained private (in Study 1) and when decisions were made public (in Study 2). Study 1, in which decisions remained private, showed no relationship between guilt and intergroup competition, whereas Study 2, in which decisions were made public, revealed mixed results. Possible explanations for these results are discussed.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017585
Psychology, Personality.

Individual-level predictors of intergroup conflict: The roles of guilt, shame and empathy.
LDR:02220nam 2200265 a 45 001 946481
005 20110523
008 110523s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3257600
035 $a AAI3257600
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Wolf, Scott T. $3 1269891
245 1 0 $a Individual-level predictors of intergroup conflict: The roles of guilt, shame and empathy.
300 $a 139 p.
500 $a Adviser: Chester A. Insko.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-03, Section: B, page: 1987.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007.
520 $a The discontinuity effect is the tendency for intergroup interactions to be more competitive, or less cooperative, than interindividual interactions in the context of mixed-motive situations. Meta-analytic methods have shown this effect to be substantially large and robust (Wildschut, Pinter, Vevea, Insko, & Schopler, 2003). Explanations for the discontinuity effect have focused on norms, schemas, identifiability, and rationalization. Although, personality factors, in general, have received limited attention, Wildschut and Insko (2006) found that dispositional guilt of group members predicted competition in an intergroup prisoner's dilemma game (PDG) but only when group members were told that their decisions would be made public to their fellow ingroup members. The present studies sought to extend these findings by measuring guilt as well as other related personality variables (e.g., shame, empathy, and psychopathy) and assessing their relationships with intergroup competition when decisions remained private (in Study 1) and when decisions were made public (in Study 2). Study 1, in which decisions remained private, showed no relationship between guilt and intergroup competition, whereas Study 2, in which decisions were made public, revealed mixed results. Possible explanations for these results are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $3 1017449
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-03B.
790 $a 0153
790 1 0 $a Insko, Chester A., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3257600