東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Prediction of odor pleasantness usin...

Williams, Archie Lamar.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Prediction of odor pleasantness using electronic nose technology and artificial neural networks.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Prediction of odor pleasantness using electronic nose technology and artificial neural networks./
作者:	Williams, Archie Lamar.
面頁冊數:	347 p.
附註:	Adviser: Paul Heinemann.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-01B.
標題:	Computer Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3248419

Prediction of odor pleasantness using electronic nose technology and artificial neural networks.
Williams, Archie Lamar.

Prediction of odor pleasantness using electronic nose technology and artificial neural networks. - 347 p.

Adviser: Paul Heinemann.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2006.

An electronic nose was used in conjunction with a human panel and artificial neural networks to predict human assessments on a hedonic (pleasantness) scale when confronted with spent and phase I mushroom substrate odors. Odor samples were collected and presented to both the electronic nose and the human panelists. The human panelists were required to rate the odor samples on a hedonic scale. After calculating the average rating from the human panel for each odor sample, the hedonic rating was matched with the 32 electronic nose sensor readings from the corresponding sample. Once the hedonic ratings had been matched to the corresponding sensor readings, the data were then used to develop and train an artificial neural network.Subjects--Topical Terms:

626642
Computer Science.

Prediction of odor pleasantness using electronic nose technology and artificial neural networks.
LDR:04223nam 2200313 a 45 001 945888
005 20110523
008 110523s2006 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3248419
035 $a AAI3248419
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Williams, Archie Lamar. $3 1269294
245 1 0 $a Prediction of odor pleasantness using electronic nose technology and artificial neural networks.
300 $a 347 p.
500 $a Adviser: Paul Heinemann.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-01, Section: B, page: 0427.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2006.
520 $a An electronic nose was used in conjunction with a human panel and artificial neural networks to predict human assessments on a hedonic (pleasantness) scale when confronted with spent and phase I mushroom substrate odors. Odor samples were collected and presented to both the electronic nose and the human panelists. The human panelists were required to rate the odor samples on a hedonic scale. After calculating the average rating from the human panel for each odor sample, the hedonic rating was matched with the 32 electronic nose sensor readings from the corresponding sample. Once the hedonic ratings had been matched to the corresponding sensor readings, the data were then used to develop and train an artificial neural network.
520 $a Two artificial neural networks were developed from these training data. The first artificial neural network was developed using Ward Systems Neuroshell 2. This neural network used 10 of the electronic nose sensor readings to predict the hedonic rating of the sample odor. This artificial neural network produced predictions with an r2 of 0.95.
520 $a The second artificial neural network was developed using Ward Systems Neuroshell Predictor. This neural network used all 32 of the electronic sensor readings to predict the hedonic rating of sample odors and was examined in two modes. The first mode of operation was termed Non-Enhanced Generalization; in this mode the artificial neural network attempted to fit the data tightly. In the Enhanced Generalization mode, the neural network predictions were not as tightly fit; this method is generally used for new inputs for which the neural network had not been trained. In Non-Enhanced Generalization mode, an r2 of 0.95 was determined. In the Enhanced Generalization mode, the predictions were a bit more relaxed; an r2 of 0.89 was determined.
520 $a The results obtained from the electronic nose data and the developed neural networks prove promising in the area of hedonic rating. It should be emphasized that this type of modeling or simulation is very specific and that any developed neural network is only as good as the data on which it is was trained. There are many considerations that need to be addressed when taking on a matter of this magnitude. First, a small change in chemical composition can radically affect the odor of a compound. Secondly, the intensity of an odor can affect the perception of an odor. For example, some odorants at small quantities are perceived as pleasant, but at higher concentrations they can become offensive. The first two considerations would require the collection of an infinite amount of data to represent all of the possible combinations. Third, in a subjective matter such as this, life experiences, cultural differences, etc., contribute to each panelist's perception of an odor. Carefully choosing and training the human panel can help minimize the third consideration. Fourth, it is well known that the human nose is much more sensitive than any electronic nose to subtle changes in an odorant. Until advances are made in the electronic nose area, this technology may not be sensitive enough to simulate human perception except for very specific and limited applications. This research may be small step toward much larger research and applications.
590 $a School code: 0176.
650 4 $a Computer Science. $3 626642
650 4 $a Engineering, Agricultural. $3 1019504
650 4 $a Engineering, Environmental. $3 783782
690 $a 0539
690 $a 0775
690 $a 0984
710 2 $a The Pennsylvania State University. $3 699896
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-01B.
790 $a 0176
790 1 0 $a Heinemann, Paul, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3248419