東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The President's Council on Bioethics...

Briggle, Adam.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The President's Council on Bioethics: Science, democracy, and the good life.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The President's Council on Bioethics: Science, democracy, and the good life./
作者:	Briggle, Adam.
面頁冊數:	332 p.
附註:	Adviser: Robert Frodeman.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-10B.
標題:	Environmental Sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3239376
ISBN:	9780542941931

The President's Council on Bioethics: Science, democracy, and the good life.
Briggle, Adam.

The President's Council on Bioethics: Science, democracy, and the good life. - 332 p.

Adviser: Robert Frodeman.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2006.

This dissertation examines the President's Council on Bioethics (Council), under the Chairmanship of Leon Kass (2001-2005). Its purpose is to advance our understanding about the relationships between philosophy, policy, and science within democratic societies. The dissertation treats the Council as a topos or place interweaving perennial themes, contingent circumstances, and multiple perspectives. Comprising more than simply a case study, the topical approach adopted here explicitly recognizes the fluidity of social and epistemological categories, tracing the Council's work across disciplinary boundaries and historical contexts. Part I sets the Council within the tradition of U.S. public bioethics committees, provides a detailed empirical account of its strategies, outcomes, and membership, and surveys its public image. Part II provides a more in-depth account of the origins and meaning of the Council's "richer bioethics." It explains how this distinctive practice was designed to correct for the inadequacies of previous bioethics commissions, and by extension, essential aspects of the modern worldview. This part concludes by arguing that the Council's classical ethical rationality enriches pluralist spheres of public debate by expanding our moral vocabulary. Part III builds from this deeper understanding of the Council's work in order to address its wider significance for society-science relations, moving beyond the world of bioethics to address the contexts of federal advisory bodies, science policy, and public philosophy. It assesses the Council in light of charges of politicization and makes recommendations for future ethics advisory committees. This part also retrospectively makes sense of the Council's work as a form of "humanities policy" that proves to be relevant in surprising and important ways. The final chapter develops the capstone concepts of "philosopher bureaucrats" and "conversation," which stem from a discussion of public philosophers and public philosophy.

ISBN: 9780542941931Subjects--Topical Terms:

676987
Environmental Sciences.

The President's Council on Bioethics: Science, democracy, and the good life.
LDR:02920nam 2200289 a 45 001 945856
005 20110523
008 110523s2006 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780542941931
035 $a (UMI)AAI3239376
035 $a AAI3239376
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Briggle, Adam. $3 629632
245 1 4 $a The President's Council on Bioethics: Science, democracy, and the good life.
300 $a 332 p.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Frodeman.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-10, Section: B, page: 5631.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2006.
520 $a This dissertation examines the President's Council on Bioethics (Council), under the Chairmanship of Leon Kass (2001-2005). Its purpose is to advance our understanding about the relationships between philosophy, policy, and science within democratic societies. The dissertation treats the Council as a topos or place interweaving perennial themes, contingent circumstances, and multiple perspectives. Comprising more than simply a case study, the topical approach adopted here explicitly recognizes the fluidity of social and epistemological categories, tracing the Council's work across disciplinary boundaries and historical contexts. Part I sets the Council within the tradition of U.S. public bioethics committees, provides a detailed empirical account of its strategies, outcomes, and membership, and surveys its public image. Part II provides a more in-depth account of the origins and meaning of the Council's "richer bioethics." It explains how this distinctive practice was designed to correct for the inadequacies of previous bioethics commissions, and by extension, essential aspects of the modern worldview. This part concludes by arguing that the Council's classical ethical rationality enriches pluralist spheres of public debate by expanding our moral vocabulary. Part III builds from this deeper understanding of the Council's work in order to address its wider significance for society-science relations, moving beyond the world of bioethics to address the contexts of federal advisory bodies, science policy, and public philosophy. It assesses the Council in light of charges of politicization and makes recommendations for future ethics advisory committees. This part also retrospectively makes sense of the Council's work as a form of "humanities policy" that proves to be relevant in surprising and important ways. The final chapter develops the capstone concepts of "philosopher bureaucrats" and "conversation," which stem from a discussion of public philosophers and public philosophy.
590 $a School code: 0051.
650 4 $a Environmental Sciences. $3 676987
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0768
710 2 $a University of Colorado at Boulder. $3 1019435
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-10B.
790 $a 0051
790 1 0 $a Frodeman, Robert, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3239376