東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Biological and physical factors affe...

Aubuchon, Matthew D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Biological and physical factors affecting catch of house flies in ultraviolet light traps.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Biological and physical factors affecting catch of house flies in ultraviolet light traps./
作者:	Aubuchon, Matthew D.
面頁冊數:	116 p.
附註:	Adviser: Paul Koehler.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-06B.
標題:	Biology, Entomology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3224499
ISBN:	9780542755255

Biological and physical factors affecting catch of house flies in ultraviolet light traps.
Aubuchon, Matthew D.

Biological and physical factors affecting catch of house flies in ultraviolet light traps. - 116 p.

Adviser: Paul Koehler.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2006.

A bioassay for studying light trap efficacy for the house fly Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) was developed to overcome position effects associated with light-trap placement. After initial studies, no significant effects of position were detected among two research buildings, four positions, or box enclosures used. The light-tunnel bioassay provided standardized air movement, trap location, trap distance, and background light for future experiments investigating house fly age and response time. House flies that were 5 d and younger showed significantly greater attraction toward UV light traps than older flies. A probit analysis estimated that catch time for 50% of house flies (CT50) toward UV traps ranged from 99 to 114 min for males and females respectively. Estimated CT50 for total house fly response toward UV light trap was approximately 1.72 h (103.2 min). The CT90 and CT95 estimates for total house fly catch were 6.01 h (360.6 min) and 8.57 h (514.2 min) for males and females respectively. No significant difference between male and female response time was seen by overlapping 95% confidence intervals for CT50, CT 90, and CT95.

ISBN: 9780542755255Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018619
Biology, Entomology.

Biological and physical factors affecting catch of house flies in ultraviolet light traps.
LDR:03489nam 2200301 a 45 001 945802
005 20110523
008 110523s2006 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780542755255
035 $a (UMI)AAI3224499
035 $a AAI3224499
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Aubuchon, Matthew D. $3 1269215
245 1 0 $a Biological and physical factors affecting catch of house flies in ultraviolet light traps.
300 $a 116 p.
500 $a Adviser: Paul Koehler.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-06, Section: B, page: 2938.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2006.
520 $a A bioassay for studying light trap efficacy for the house fly Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) was developed to overcome position effects associated with light-trap placement. After initial studies, no significant effects of position were detected among two research buildings, four positions, or box enclosures used. The light-tunnel bioassay provided standardized air movement, trap location, trap distance, and background light for future experiments investigating house fly age and response time. House flies that were 5 d and younger showed significantly greater attraction toward UV light traps than older flies. A probit analysis estimated that catch time for 50% of house flies (CT50) toward UV traps ranged from 99 to 114 min for males and females respectively. Estimated CT50 for total house fly response toward UV light trap was approximately 1.72 h (103.2 min). The CT90 and CT95 estimates for total house fly catch were 6.01 h (360.6 min) and 8.57 h (514.2 min) for males and females respectively. No significant difference between male and female response time was seen by overlapping 95% confidence intervals for CT50, CT 90, and CT95.
520 $a When flies were presented greater intensity levels of cool-white fluorescent light, the number of males caught in UV traps significantly decreased when intensity of the competing light exceeded 51.43 lumens/m2. Significant declines in catch of females occurred at a lower intensity when the competing light exceeded 27.43 lumens/m2. When the data were combined, overall results showed that the total catch in UV light traps decreased significantly as the intensity of competing light source increased. Results of our lab study showed a significant decrease in response of male and female house flies toward UV light traps as the intensity of competing fluorescent light was increased.
520 $a When house flies were presented four different types of competing light, all responses were significantly different when compared with the dark control. However, house fly response toward UV light traps was significantly lower when background light contained broad-based UV versus background light containing blue-green light.
520 $a For habituation experiments, all treatments caught significantly fewer house flies than the dark control. However, there was no significant difference in the response to UV light traps among house flies reared on UV light, cool-white fluorescent light, and the grow-lights used in the rearing rooms. The quality of light used in rearing did not significantly influence house fly response to UV light traps.
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Biology, Entomology. $3 1018619
690 $a 0353
710 2 $a University of Florida. $3 718949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-06B.
790 $a 0070
790 1 0 $a Koehler, Paul, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3224499