東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The importance of cross-level analys...

Langfred, Claus Willem.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The importance of cross-level analysis and contextual contingencies when granting autonomy to groups and individuals in organizations.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The importance of cross-level analysis and contextual contingencies when granting autonomy to groups and individuals in organizations./
作者:	Langfred, Claus Willem.
面頁冊數:	111 p.
附註:	Adviser: Paul Hirsch.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International59-05A.
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9832632
ISBN:	9780591857276

The importance of cross-level analysis and contextual contingencies when granting autonomy to groups and individuals in organizations.
Langfred, Claus Willem.

The importance of cross-level analysis and contextual contingencies when granting autonomy to groups and individuals in organizations. - 111 p.

Adviser: Paul Hirsch.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 1998.

This study explores the granting of autonomy in organizational work groups, and develops a theoretical framework for conceptualizing different types of work groups based on the combination of individual and group-level autonomy. This framework also considers the influence of specific contextual contingencies on the implementation and success of self-management interventions. It is hypothesized that high individual and high group autonomy can have countervailing effects, and that group cohesiveness is one mechanism by which such effects might be mediated. It is also hypothesized that task interdependence, a contextual characteristic, moderates the effects of individual and group autonomy on group effectiveness, and that again, the combination of individual and group autonomy may have unintended, and possibly destructive, effects. Data from three different settings are used: a government social service agency, a large military unit, and a private-sector high technology firm. Hierarchical multiple regression is used to test hypotheses, and the results indicate that individual and group autonomy can have opposite effects on group effectiveness, partially mediated through group cohesiveness. Both within- and between-organization analyses also suggest a moderating effect of task interdependence on the relationship between individual-level and group-level autonomy and work group effectiveness.

ISBN: 9780591857276Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

The importance of cross-level analysis and contextual contingencies when granting autonomy to groups and individuals in organizations.
LDR:02382nam 2200301 a 45 001 943455
005 20110520
008 110520s1998 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780591857276
035 $a (UMI)AAI9832632
035 $a AAI9832632
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Langfred, Claus Willem. $3 1267496
245 1 4 $a The importance of cross-level analysis and contextual contingencies when granting autonomy to groups and individuals in organizations.
300 $a 111 p.
500 $a Adviser: Paul Hirsch.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-05, Section: A, page: 1662.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 1998.
520 $a This study explores the granting of autonomy in organizational work groups, and develops a theoretical framework for conceptualizing different types of work groups based on the combination of individual and group-level autonomy. This framework also considers the influence of specific contextual contingencies on the implementation and success of self-management interventions. It is hypothesized that high individual and high group autonomy can have countervailing effects, and that group cohesiveness is one mechanism by which such effects might be mediated. It is also hypothesized that task interdependence, a contextual characteristic, moderates the effects of individual and group autonomy on group effectiveness, and that again, the combination of individual and group autonomy may have unintended, and possibly destructive, effects. Data from three different settings are used: a government social service agency, a large military unit, and a private-sector high technology firm. Hierarchical multiple regression is used to test hypotheses, and the results indicate that individual and group autonomy can have opposite effects on group effectiveness, partially mediated through group cohesiveness. Both within- and between-organization analyses also suggest a moderating effect of task interdependence on the relationship between individual-level and group-level autonomy and work group effectiveness.
590 $a School code: 0163.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0629
710 2 $a Northwestern University. $3 1018161
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 59-05A.
790 $a 0163
790 1 0 $a Hirsch, Paul, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1998
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9832632