東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

American exceptionalism and the Shoa...

Worthington, David L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

American exceptionalism and the Shoah: The case of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	American exceptionalism and the Shoah: The case of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum./
作者:	Worthington, David L.
面頁冊數:	241 p.
附註:	Adviser: John Louis Lucaites.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-06A.
標題:	History, United States. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3268343
ISBN:	9780549069355

American exceptionalism and the Shoah: The case of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
Worthington, David L.

American exceptionalism and the Shoah: The case of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. - 241 p.

Adviser: John Louis Lucaites.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2007.

This dissertation analyzes the rhetoric of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum as a site that constructs, articulates, and advances an ideology of American exceptionalism. The critical thrust of the project is to demonstrate how the museum produces a narrow set of terministic screens for understanding American connections to the European holocaust that make it difficult to productively engage problematic instances of U.S. history such as slavery and the genocide of the native Americans. To this end, the study focuses on public debates surrounding the founding and placement of the museum, the narrative of the museum's Permanent Exhibit, the physical exhibits that shape American exceptionalism, and the ways in which visitors respond to the museum story in comment books. The argument unfolds in 5 stages. The first stage examines the ways in which public debate during the museum's planning stages took up the issue of the propriety of a "Holocaust" museum in the U.S. and then addressed where the museum would be located and what kind of narrative would be consistent with placing the museum in close proximity to the National Mall. Stage two explores the museum's insistence on a strictly defined and overly simplistic narrative that marks the participants in the Shoah as victims, perpetrators, or liberators. Stage three focuses on the narrative of the museum's Permanent Exhibit, where the museum interpellates visitors as "witnesses" without providing a clear sense of what the act of witnessing entails. In the fourth stage "citizenship" is made passive by exhibits that evoke a sense of tragedy and atrocity that exists "over there" (in Europe) and whose victims are "other" and outside the bounds and protection of American style liberal democracy. Stage four shifts focus from the narrative as articulated by museum curators and towards the way visitors respond to the museum in comment books, and in particular on the most common response by museum visitors that they feel "sad." "Sadness," I argue, is a problematic public emotion that represses civic action. The project concludes in stage five by discussing ways in which exhibits might be added that would widen our terministic understanding of the past so as to allow for a more productive consideration of the ways in which and the topos of "atrocity" implicates the politics of genocide.

ISBN: 9780549069355Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017393
History, United States.

American exceptionalism and the Shoah: The case of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
LDR:03316nam 2200301 a 45 001 943286
005 20110520
008 110520s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549069355
035 $a (UMI)AAI3268343
035 $a AAI3268343
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Worthington, David L. $3 1267325
245 1 0 $a American exceptionalism and the Shoah: The case of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
300 $a 241 p.
500 $a Adviser: John Louis Lucaites.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-06, Section: A, page: 2439.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2007.
520 $a This dissertation analyzes the rhetoric of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum as a site that constructs, articulates, and advances an ideology of American exceptionalism. The critical thrust of the project is to demonstrate how the museum produces a narrow set of terministic screens for understanding American connections to the European holocaust that make it difficult to productively engage problematic instances of U.S. history such as slavery and the genocide of the native Americans. To this end, the study focuses on public debates surrounding the founding and placement of the museum, the narrative of the museum's Permanent Exhibit, the physical exhibits that shape American exceptionalism, and the ways in which visitors respond to the museum story in comment books. The argument unfolds in 5 stages. The first stage examines the ways in which public debate during the museum's planning stages took up the issue of the propriety of a "Holocaust" museum in the U.S. and then addressed where the museum would be located and what kind of narrative would be consistent with placing the museum in close proximity to the National Mall. Stage two explores the museum's insistence on a strictly defined and overly simplistic narrative that marks the participants in the Shoah as victims, perpetrators, or liberators. Stage three focuses on the narrative of the museum's Permanent Exhibit, where the museum interpellates visitors as "witnesses" without providing a clear sense of what the act of witnessing entails. In the fourth stage "citizenship" is made passive by exhibits that evoke a sense of tragedy and atrocity that exists "over there" (in Europe) and whose victims are "other" and outside the bounds and protection of American style liberal democracy. Stage four shifts focus from the narrative as articulated by museum curators and towards the way visitors respond to the museum in comment books, and in particular on the most common response by museum visitors that they feel "sad." "Sadness," I argue, is a problematic public emotion that represses civic action. The project concludes in stage five by discussing ways in which exhibits might be added that would widen our terministic understanding of the past so as to allow for a more productive consideration of the ways in which and the topos of "atrocity" implicates the politics of genocide.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 1019205
650 4 $a Museology. $3 1018504
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0730
710 2 $a Indiana University. $3 960096
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-06A.
790 $a 0093
790 1 0 $a Lucaites, John Louis, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3268343