東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Signs, shocks, and effects of instit...

The Ohio State University.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Signs, shocks, and effects of institutional review processes on qualitative research: Complexities all the way down.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Signs, shocks, and effects of institutional review processes on qualitative research: Complexities all the way down./
作者:	Evans, Jane Tarbutton.
面頁冊數:	269 p.
附註:	Adviser: Suzanne K. Damarin.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-04A.
標題:	Education, Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3262135
ISBN:	9780549000211

Signs, shocks, and effects of institutional review processes on qualitative research: Complexities all the way down.
Evans, Jane Tarbutton.

Signs, shocks, and effects of institutional review processes on qualitative research: Complexities all the way down. - 269 p.

Adviser: Suzanne K. Damarin.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2007.

This dissertation research investigates the concept and practices of ethical responsibility in the conduct of research at universities. Recently enacted federal mandates for institutional accountability require individual researchers to demonstrate responsibility in the conduct of research by complying with prescriptive procedures that define ethical practices according to ostensibly objective standards and assume that responsibility is demonstrable. Federal policies and regulations do not address the ways qualitative researchers working in educational settings might respond to more nuanced questions of ethical responsibility. There exists, then, a gap between federal and institutional requirements and the behavior researchers demonstrate as they interpret and apply standards for human subject research within their own work. In this study, I consider consistencies and disparities between researchers' obligations to comply with federally mandated standards as well as institutional requirements and researchers' ethical responsibilities to foreground the protection of human subjects in research.

ISBN: 9780549000211Subjects--Topical Terms:

626645
Education, Administration.

Signs, shocks, and effects of institutional review processes on qualitative research: Complexities all the way down.
LDR:03154nam 2200313 a 45 001 940969
005 20110518
008 110518s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549000211
035 $a (UMI)AAI3262135
035 $a AAI3262135
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Evans, Jane Tarbutton. $3 1265110
245 1 0 $a Signs, shocks, and effects of institutional review processes on qualitative research: Complexities all the way down.
300 $a 269 p.
500 $a Adviser: Suzanne K. Damarin.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-04, Section: A, page: 1415.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2007.
520 $a This dissertation research investigates the concept and practices of ethical responsibility in the conduct of research at universities. Recently enacted federal mandates for institutional accountability require individual researchers to demonstrate responsibility in the conduct of research by complying with prescriptive procedures that define ethical practices according to ostensibly objective standards and assume that responsibility is demonstrable. Federal policies and regulations do not address the ways qualitative researchers working in educational settings might respond to more nuanced questions of ethical responsibility. There exists, then, a gap between federal and institutional requirements and the behavior researchers demonstrate as they interpret and apply standards for human subject research within their own work. In this study, I consider consistencies and disparities between researchers' obligations to comply with federally mandated standards as well as institutional requirements and researchers' ethical responsibilities to foreground the protection of human subjects in research.
520 $a The study is multi-sited and takes a postmodern emergent approach to investigating questions of what is meant by the notion of responsibility in research, how ethical responsibility might be demonstrated by researchers in academic communities, and in what ways institutional review processes affect underlying ethical principles in responsible conduct of research. Standpoint epistemologies inform the construction and interpretations of researchers' actions, beliefs, and values. The empirical work traces effects of institutional review boards in an ethnographic study carried out for more than two years and across three subject positions.
520 $a The study concludes with a case study focusing on a teacher education program that balances ethical principles of justice and autonomy. The case study report is grounded in earlier fieldwork and translates theoretical knowledge into action. The goal of culminating project is to demonstrate an empirically based model for initiating change in the often troublesome relationships between IRBs and education researchers.
590 $a School code: 0168.
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Education, Social Sciences. $3 1019148
650 4 $a Education, Teacher Training. $3 783747
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0534
710 2 $a The Ohio State University. $3 718944
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-04A.
790 $a 0168
790 1 0 $a Damarin, Suzanne K., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3262135