東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Optometry admission interviews: A ca...

Spafford, Marlee Marie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Optometry admission interviews: A case study of participant expectations and experiences.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Optometry admission interviews: A case study of participant expectations and experiences./
作者:	Spafford, Marlee Marie.
面頁冊數:	236 p.
附註:	Adviser: George L. Geis.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International60-01A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ35330
ISBN:	9780612353305

Optometry admission interviews: A case study of participant expectations and experiences.
Spafford, Marlee Marie.

Optometry admission interviews: A case study of participant expectations and experiences. - 236 p.

Adviser: George L. Geis.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 1998.

The use of an admission interview by healthcare professional programs is widespread, yet the predictive ability of this selection tool has been found to be low due, in part, to the presence of numerous design flaws. This study of a Canadian optometry program at the University of Waterloo (UW) examined its admission interview from the perspective of its participants: the interviewers and the applicants. A survey was developed through a literature review, a series of research interviews, and a pilot test. The survey collected demographic information and participant perceptions relating to the purpose of and the candidate qualities assessed by: an ideal optometry admission committee, an ideal optometry interview, and the UW interview. Questions were also posed about the future of the UW interview. The questionnaire was sent in 1996 to all interviewed candidates (157) and all interviewers (23). The response rate was 71.7%. Principal component analysis was performed to reduce the data into thematic components. Independent and paired t-tests were used to compare the components. Applicants and interviewers shared a common vision of the ideal interviews purpose and content. The importance of this finding was discussed in terms of a symbolic interactionist approach. That is, through social interaction, these participants had attached a common meaning to admission interviews. Applicants and interviewers held significantly different views of the UW interviews purpose and content. Their experiences with the UW interview were also significantly different than their expectations of an ideal interview. Applicants judged their interview experience based largely on the interviewers' behavior while interviewers had the benefit of knowing more about the program's admission process. The greatest perceived difference between the UW interview and the ideal interview regarded clarifying candidate information. The inability of the UW interview to provide this function in the presence of a strong desire to do so was interpreted as a major determinant in creating a crisis of confidence in the UW interview. This descriptive study provides an approach for the program's administrators to re-evaluate the interviews purpose and content and offers an explanation for the interviews longevity.

ISBN: 9780612353305Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

Optometry admission interviews: A case study of participant expectations and experiences.
LDR:03220nam 2200289 a 45 001 940815
005 20110518
008 110518s1998 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780612353305
035 $a (UMI)AAINQ35330
035 $a AAINQ35330
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Spafford, Marlee Marie. $3 1264943
245 1 0 $a Optometry admission interviews: A case study of participant expectations and experiences.
300 $a 236 p.
500 $a Adviser: George L. Geis.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-01, Section: A, page: 0081.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 1998.
520 $a The use of an admission interview by healthcare professional programs is widespread, yet the predictive ability of this selection tool has been found to be low due, in part, to the presence of numerous design flaws. This study of a Canadian optometry program at the University of Waterloo (UW) examined its admission interview from the perspective of its participants: the interviewers and the applicants. A survey was developed through a literature review, a series of research interviews, and a pilot test. The survey collected demographic information and participant perceptions relating to the purpose of and the candidate qualities assessed by: an ideal optometry admission committee, an ideal optometry interview, and the UW interview. Questions were also posed about the future of the UW interview. The questionnaire was sent in 1996 to all interviewed candidates (157) and all interviewers (23). The response rate was 71.7%. Principal component analysis was performed to reduce the data into thematic components. Independent and paired t-tests were used to compare the components. Applicants and interviewers shared a common vision of the ideal interviews purpose and content. The importance of this finding was discussed in terms of a symbolic interactionist approach. That is, through social interaction, these participants had attached a common meaning to admission interviews. Applicants and interviewers held significantly different views of the UW interviews purpose and content. Their experiences with the UW interview were also significantly different than their expectations of an ideal interview. Applicants judged their interview experience based largely on the interviewers' behavior while interviewers had the benefit of knowing more about the program's admission process. The greatest perceived difference between the UW interview and the ideal interview regarded clarifying candidate information. The inability of the UW interview to provide this function in the presence of a strong desire to do so was interpreted as a major determinant in creating a crisis of confidence in the UW interview. This descriptive study provides an approach for the program's administrators to re-evaluate the interviews purpose and content and offers an explanation for the interviews longevity.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Ophthalmology. $3 1019445
690 $a 0350
690 $a 0381
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $3 1017674
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 60-01A.
790 $a 0779
790 1 0 $a Geis, George L., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1998
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ35330