東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The relationship between response pr...

Fricker, Scott S.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The relationship between response propensity and data quality in the Current Population Survey and the American Time Use Survey.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The relationship between response propensity and data quality in the Current Population Survey and the American Time Use Survey./
作者:	Fricker, Scott S.
面頁冊數:	196 p.
附註:	Adviser: Roger Tourangeau.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-04A.
標題:	Psychology, Cognitive. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3260456

The relationship between response propensity and data quality in the Current Population Survey and the American Time Use Survey.
Fricker, Scott S.

The relationship between response propensity and data quality in the Current Population Survey and the American Time Use Survey. - 196 p.

Adviser: Roger Tourangeau.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2007.

An important theoretical question in survey research over the past fifty years has been: How does bringing in late or reluctant respondents affect total survey error? Does the effort and expense of obtaining interviews from difficult to contact or reluctant respondents significantly decrease the nonresponse error of survey estimates? Or do these late respondents introduce enough measurement error to offset any reductions in nonresponse bias? This dissertation attempted to address these questions by examining nonresponse and data quality in two national household surveys---the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the American Time Use Survey (ATUS). Response propensity models were first developed for each survey, and busyness and social capital explanations of nonresponse were evaluated in light of the results. Using respondents' predicted probability of response, simulations were carried out to examine whether nonresponse bias was linked to response rates. Next, data quality in each survey was assessed by a variety of indirect indicators of response error---e.g., item missing data rates, round value reports, interview-reinterview response inconsistencies, etc.---and the causal roles of various household, respondent, and survey design attributes on the level of reporting error were explored. The principal analyses investigated the relationship between response propensity and the data quality indicators in each survey, and examined the effects of potential common causal factors when there was evidence of covariation. The implications of the findings from this study for survey practitioners and for nonresponse and measurement error studies are discussed.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017810
Psychology, Cognitive.

The relationship between response propensity and data quality in the Current Population Survey and the American Time Use Survey.
LDR:02618nam 2200277 a 45 001 940388
005 20110518
008 110518s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3260456
035 $a AAI3260456
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Fricker, Scott S. $3 1264514
245 1 4 $a The relationship between response propensity and data quality in the Current Population Survey and the American Time Use Survey.
300 $a 196 p.
500 $a Adviser: Roger Tourangeau.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-04, Section: A, page: 1687.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2007.
520 $a An important theoretical question in survey research over the past fifty years has been: How does bringing in late or reluctant respondents affect total survey error? Does the effort and expense of obtaining interviews from difficult to contact or reluctant respondents significantly decrease the nonresponse error of survey estimates? Or do these late respondents introduce enough measurement error to offset any reductions in nonresponse bias? This dissertation attempted to address these questions by examining nonresponse and data quality in two national household surveys---the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the American Time Use Survey (ATUS). Response propensity models were first developed for each survey, and busyness and social capital explanations of nonresponse were evaluated in light of the results. Using respondents' predicted probability of response, simulations were carried out to examine whether nonresponse bias was linked to response rates. Next, data quality in each survey was assessed by a variety of indirect indicators of response error---e.g., item missing data rates, round value reports, interview-reinterview response inconsistencies, etc.---and the causal roles of various household, respondent, and survey design attributes on the level of reporting error were explored. The principal analyses investigated the relationship between response propensity and the data quality indicators in each survey, and examined the effects of potential common causal factors when there was evidence of covariation. The implications of the findings from this study for survey practitioners and for nonresponse and measurement error studies are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0463
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Survey Methodology. $3 1264515
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-04A.
790 $a 0117
790 1 0 $a Tourangeau, Roger, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3260456