東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Bayer & Company in the United States...

Reimer, Thomas Martin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Bayer & Company in the United States: German dyes, drugs, and cartels in the Progressive Era.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Bayer & Company in the United States: German dyes, drugs, and cartels in the Progressive Era./
作者:	Reimer, Thomas Martin.
面頁冊數:	429 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-07, Section: A, page: 3213.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International57-07A.
標題:	Economics, Commerce-Business. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9633050

Bayer & Company in the United States: German dyes, drugs, and cartels in the Progressive Era.
Reimer, Thomas Martin.

Bayer & Company in the United States: German dyes, drugs, and cartels in the Progressive Era. - 429 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-07, Section: A, page: 3213.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 1996.

In 1918-1919, the Wilson administration confiscated all German private property, and then tried to eliminate German coal-tar chemical firms from the American market. Alien Property Custodian A. Mitchell Palmer, the driving force behind these measures, justified them because of the danger to national security caused by the state-supported monopolistic cartels and agents of German imperialism. He cited as prominent example the American branch of the Farbenfabriken vormals Friedrich Bayer, or Bayer Company.Subjects--Topical Terms:

626649
Economics, Commerce-Business.

Bayer & Company in the United States: German dyes, drugs, and cartels in the Progressive Era.
LDR:03244nam 2200277 a 45 001 940033
005 20110517
008 110517s1996 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI9633050
035 $a AAI9633050
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Reimer, Thomas Martin. $3 1264142
245 1 0 $a Bayer & Company in the United States: German dyes, drugs, and cartels in the Progressive Era.
300 $a 429 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-07, Section: A, page: 3213.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 1996.
520 $a In 1918-1919, the Wilson administration confiscated all German private property, and then tried to eliminate German coal-tar chemical firms from the American market. Alien Property Custodian A. Mitchell Palmer, the driving force behind these measures, justified them because of the danger to national security caused by the state-supported monopolistic cartels and agents of German imperialism. He cited as prominent example the American branch of the Farbenfabriken vormals Friedrich Bayer, or Bayer Company.
520 $a Based on German coal and steel firms, German corporations during the Wilhelmine era have been described as very bureaucratic and anti-competitive; also, in Germany market monopolies were legal and encouraged by the government. Such monopolies were bound to offend Americans, who during the Progressive Era were deeply concerned about their political power. Using the archives of the Bayer Company in Leverkusen, Germany, and holdings at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., Suitland, Maryland, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and New York City, the trade press and other sources, this study looks at Bayer's activities in the United States. Bayer's business-oriented and flexible culture was similar to that of American firms, and differences not due to its German ownership. So was its conduct angering American authorities, such as the use of kickbacks for sales and hiding owning the branch to avoid the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. But Bayer's aggressive profit seeking culture, and idiosyncratic events, prevented the creation of a general German dye and drug cartel in the United States.
520 $a The branch clashed with American interest groups such as druggists, who to gain public sympathy portrayed the firm as a German trust. After 1914, the dye firms were also accused of political conspiracy. Yet until March 1918, the American government did not move against them, partly because such charges were clearly false, until Palmer took advantage of wartime Manichaeism and Progressive ideology to convince Wilson that the charges were true. This study shows that differences between German firms and those of other Western countries could be smaller than they seemed at the time, and fear of German economic imperialism often due to misunderstanding. The emphasis on national differences to explain conflict between Imperial Germany and the United States seems unjustified, at least in the economic sphere.
590 $a School code: 0659.
650 4 $a Economics, Commerce-Business. $3 626649
650 4 $a History, European. $3 1018076
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
690 $a 0335
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0505
710 2 $a Syracuse University. $3 1017440
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 57-07A.
790 $a 0659
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1996
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9633050