東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An axiological study of Durkheim and...

Dubeski, Norman Darcy.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An axiological study of Durkheim and Weber (Emile Durkheim, Max Weber).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An axiological study of Durkheim and Weber (Emile Durkheim, Max Weber)./
作者:	Dubeski, Norman Darcy.
面頁冊數:	316 p.
附註:	Adviser: C. Levitt.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-02A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ66203
ISBN:	0612662039

An axiological study of Durkheim and Weber (Emile Durkheim, Max Weber).
Dubeski, Norman Darcy.

An axiological study of Durkheim and Weber (Emile Durkheim, Max Weber). - 316 p.

Adviser: C. Levitt.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--McMaster University (Canada), 1999.

This work examines the contributions of Emile Durkheim and Max Weber to the study of moral phenomena. Durkheim advocated extreme social realism and explained morality as the product of the collective nature of society. However, ample evidence is found to suggest that he conflated the terms ‘collective’ and ‘societal.’ Durkheim gave a convincing explanation for the power of the beliefs and ideals of society, its ‘collective representations,’ but to the extent that his paradigm attempts to become holistic, it fails. Durkheim's errors are described and explained in relation to his own perspective of social realism and to the perspective of methodological individualism. Durkheim's theory readily comes to grip with moral issues faster than alternate theories, but in certain assumptions remains a matter of faith, especially in the belief that society is a collective entity.

ISBN: 0612662039Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

An axiological study of Durkheim and Weber (Emile Durkheim, Max Weber).
LDR:02835nam 2200289 a 45 001 937066
005 20110511
008 110511s1999 eng d
020 $a 0612662039
035 $a (UnM)AAINQ66203
035 $a AAINQ66203
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Dubeski, Norman Darcy. $3 1260933
245 1 0 $a An axiological study of Durkheim and Weber (Emile Durkheim, Max Weber).
300 $a 316 p.
500 $a Adviser: C. Levitt.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-02, Section: A, page: 0782.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--McMaster University (Canada), 1999.
520 $a This work examines the contributions of Emile Durkheim and Max Weber to the study of moral phenomena. Durkheim advocated extreme social realism and explained morality as the product of the collective nature of society. However, ample evidence is found to suggest that he conflated the terms ‘collective’ and ‘societal.’ Durkheim gave a convincing explanation for the power of the beliefs and ideals of society, its ‘collective representations,’ but to the extent that his paradigm attempts to become holistic, it fails. Durkheim's errors are described and explained in relation to his own perspective of social realism and to the perspective of methodological individualism. Durkheim's theory readily comes to grip with moral issues faster than alternate theories, but in certain assumptions remains a matter of faith, especially in the belief that society is a collective entity.
520 $a Methodological individualism remains a better approach for the study of moral phenomena, but is not yet, by itself, the only method. Research in this area can only benefit from an examination of the Durkheimian approach—without of course, accepting the genuine flaws in Durkheim's reasoning. It would appear that the final authority in the sociological investigation of moral phenomena must be methodological individualism. This does not mean that there can be no role for collective concepts derived directly from social realism and its extreme form of social holism. It appears that there are no grounds for formal <italic> rapprochement</italic> and integration between methodological individualism and collective concepts, at least no possibility was found by an examination of both Durkheim and Weber. Collective concepts may indeed be a useful heuristic device and a means to open up additional questions for investigation, but the final judgement of issues must be made within the premises of methodological individualism.
590 $a School code: 0197.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0422
710 2 0 $a McMaster University (Canada). $3 1024893
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-02A.
790 $a 0197
790 1 0 $a Levitt, C., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1999
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ66203