東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The body of Dasein: Heidegger's int...

Bowles, Brian Hansford.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger)./
作者:	Bowles, Brian Hansford.
面頁冊數:	263 p.
附註:	Director: Thomas Sheehan.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-01A
標題:	Philosophy -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3039269
ISBN:	0493527710

The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger).
Bowles, Brian Hansford.

The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger). - 263 p.

Director: Thomas Sheehan.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loyola University of Chicago, 2002.

<?Pub Inc> This study develops a Heideggerian thesis on the significance of Dasein's bodiliness. In <italic>Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie</italic> (Summer 1924), Heidegger claims that bodiliness secures the ground for the full being of the human. I situate this thesis squarely within <italic>die Sache selbst</italic> for Heidegger. <italic>Die Sache selbst</italic> concerns the issue of <italic>how being itself is engendered in human understanding </italic>. From as early as 1921, Heidegger explicitly understands his central topic in terms of <math> <f> <g>k</g><a><ac><g>i</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>n</g><g>h</g> <g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>. That is, the emergence of being in conjunction with the ontological structure of the human being is ultimately intelligible as a kind of movement. The 1924 thesis makes sense ultimately insofar as bodiliness itself is understood as the ontological movement—the original being-moved or <math> <f> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> </f> </math>—that allows entities to appear within the domain of human concerns. After examining Heidegger's retrieval of several key Aristotelian concepts (such as <math> <f> <hsp sp="0.167"><hsp sp="0.167">,<hsp sp="-0.167"> <hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><a><ac><g>3</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a> <g>c</g><g>3</g><g>i</g><g>n</g>,<hsp sp="0.212"><hsp sp="0.212"> `<hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><g>h</g> <g>d</g>o<g>n</g><a><ac><g>h</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a>,<hsp sp="0.212"> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> ,<hsp sp="0.212"><g>k</g><a><ac><g>i</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a> <g>n</g><g>h</g><g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>, and <math> <f> <g>s</g><g>t</g><a><ac><g>3</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>r</g> <g>h</g><g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>), I interpret bodiliness as the always already operative (<italic> a priori</italic>) being-pulled-out-ahead-of-itself (being-moved or opened) by its own essential lack. Entities are first able to be present to Dasein <italic> because</italic> Dasein is opened in this way. Thus, bodiliness on my reading is <italic>die Sache selbst</italic>. My interpretation of Heidegger's thesis also forms the interpretive starting point for a rereading of <italic>Geworfenheit </italic> and <italic>Gewesenheit</italic> as concepts of bodiliness. As Dasein's original <math> <f> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> </f> </math>, bodiliness in <italic>Sein und Zeit</italic> would go by the name <italic> die gewesene Geworfenheit</italic>: the <italic>a priori</italic> or always already operative thrown-open-ness that first allows being to emerge to human understanding

ISBN: 0493527710Subjects--Topical Terms:

550317
Philosophy

The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger).
LDR:03644nam 2200265 a 45 001 936586
005 20110510
008 110510s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493527710
035 $a (UnM)AAI3039269
035 $a AAI3039269
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Bowles, Brian Hansford. $3 1260298
245 1 0 $a The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger).
300 $a 263 p.
500 $a Director: Thomas Sheehan.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-01, Section: A, page: 0210.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loyola University of Chicago, 2002.
520 $a <?Pub Inc> This study develops a Heideggerian thesis on the significance of Dasein's bodiliness. In <italic>Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie</italic> (Summer 1924), Heidegger claims that bodiliness secures the ground for the full being of the human. I situate this thesis squarely within <italic>die Sache selbst</italic> for Heidegger. <italic>Die Sache selbst</italic> concerns the issue of <italic>how being itself is engendered in human understanding </italic>. From as early as 1921, Heidegger explicitly understands his central topic in terms of <math> <f> <g>k</g><a><ac><g>i</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>n</g><g>h</g> <g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>. That is, the emergence of being in conjunction with the ontological structure of the human being is ultimately intelligible as a kind of movement. The 1924 thesis makes sense ultimately insofar as bodiliness itself is understood as the ontological movement—the original being-moved or <math> <f> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> </f> </math>—that allows entities to appear within the domain of human concerns. After examining Heidegger's retrieval of several key Aristotelian concepts (such as <math> <f> <hsp sp="0.167"><hsp sp="0.167">,<hsp sp="-0.167"> <hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><a><ac><g>3</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a> <g>c</g><g>3</g><g>i</g><g>n</g>,<hsp sp="0.212"><hsp sp="0.212"> `<hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><g>h</g> <g>d</g>o<g>n</g><a><ac><g>h</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a>,<hsp sp="0.212"> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> ,<hsp sp="0.212"><g>k</g><a><ac><g>i</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a> <g>n</g><g>h</g><g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>, and <math> <f> <g>s</g><g>t</g><a><ac><g>3</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>r</g> <g>h</g><g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>), I interpret bodiliness as the always already operative (<italic> a priori</italic>) being-pulled-out-ahead-of-itself (being-moved or opened) by its own essential lack. Entities are first able to be present to Dasein <italic> because</italic> Dasein is opened in this way. Thus, bodiliness on my reading is <italic>die Sache selbst</italic>. My interpretation of Heidegger's thesis also forms the interpretive starting point for a rereading of <italic>Geworfenheit </italic> and <italic>Gewesenheit</italic> as concepts of bodiliness. As Dasein's original <math> <f> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> </f> </math>, bodiliness in <italic>Sein und Zeit</italic> would go by the name <italic> die gewesene Geworfenheit</italic>: the <italic>a priori</italic> or always already operative thrown-open-ness that first allows being to emerge to human understanding
590 $a School code: 0112
650 $a Philosophy $3 550317
690 $a 042
710 2 $a Loyola University of Chicago $3 1260299
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-01A
790 $a 011
790 1 $a Sheehan, Thomas, $e adviso
791 $a Ph.D
792 $a 200
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3039269