東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Recapturing suburbia: Urban secessi...

Hogen-Esch, Tom Jan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Recapturing suburbia: Urban secession and the politics of growth in Los Angeles, Boston, and Seattle (California, Massachusetts, Washington).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Recapturing suburbia: Urban secession and the politics of growth in Los Angeles, Boston, and Seattle (California, Massachusetts, Washington)./
作者:	Hogen-Esch, Tom Jan.
面頁冊數:	395 p.
附註:	Adviser: Michael B. Preston.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-12A.
標題:	Political Science, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3073794
ISBN:	0493938990

Recapturing suburbia: Urban secession and the politics of growth in Los Angeles, Boston, and Seattle (California, Massachusetts, Washington).
Hogen-Esch, Tom Jan.

Recapturing suburbia: Urban secession and the politics of growth in Los Angeles, Boston, and Seattle (California, Massachusetts, Washington). - 395 p.

Adviser: Michael B. Preston.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2002.

This study examines the formation of territorially-based social movements to secede from the cities of Los Angeles, Boston, and Seattle. The central contention is that urban secession movements are best understood within the context of a city's growth politics. First, it is argued that the goal of protecting the community from external land use threats fueled each social movement. The dissertation traces the rise of Valley Voters Organized Toward Empowerment (Valley VOTE) in San Fernando Valley and Neighborhood Rights in West Seattle as “small property” coalitions to combat the threat of residential and commercial disinvestment, low-income housing, and other forms of urbanization. Unlike the Valley and West Seattle, in Boston, decades of public and private-sponsored capital investment threatened to displace the city's minority population from Greater Roxbury. In response, community activists formed the Greater Roxbury Incorporation Project (GRIP) to protect the city's minority communities from wholesale displacement.

ISBN: 0493938990Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

Recapturing suburbia: Urban secession and the politics of growth in Los Angeles, Boston, and Seattle (California, Massachusetts, Washington).
LDR:03265nam 2200301 a 45 001 936209
005 20110510
008 110510s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493938990
035 $a (UnM)AAI3073794
035 $a AAI3073794
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hogen-Esch, Tom Jan. $3 1259901
245 1 0 $a Recapturing suburbia: Urban secession and the politics of growth in Los Angeles, Boston, and Seattle (California, Massachusetts, Washington).
300 $a 395 p.
500 $a Adviser: Michael B. Preston.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-12, Section: A, page: 4454.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2002.
520 $a This study examines the formation of territorially-based social movements to secede from the cities of Los Angeles, Boston, and Seattle. The central contention is that urban secession movements are best understood within the context of a city's growth politics. First, it is argued that the goal of protecting the community from external land use threats fueled each social movement. The dissertation traces the rise of Valley Voters Organized Toward Empowerment (Valley VOTE) in San Fernando Valley and Neighborhood Rights in West Seattle as “small property” coalitions to combat the threat of residential and commercial disinvestment, low-income housing, and other forms of urbanization. Unlike the Valley and West Seattle, in Boston, decades of public and private-sponsored capital investment threatened to displace the city's minority population from Greater Roxbury. In response, community activists formed the Greater Roxbury Incorporation Project (GRIP) to protect the city's minority communities from wholesale displacement.
520 $a Second, the study finds that current theories fail to adequately explain instances where pro and slow growth forces act collectively to reproduce urban space. Existing literature typically depicts home and business organizations as either bitter land use foes, or occasional allies on the issue of lower taxes. Valley VOTE and Neighborhood Rights/WSDF illustrate ways in “small property” seeks to impose a common land use vision based on creating an optimal balance of residential and commercial amenities.
520 $a Third, comparison of Valley VOTE and Neighborhood Rights/WSDF with GRIP highlights fundamental differences in the nature of coalition building between two types of protectionist social movements. It is argued that differences between the processes of investment and disinvestment fundamentally shape the formation and maintenance of urban social movements. The case of GRIP/FATE reveals that social movements to prevent gentrification invariably find their base of support not among property owners, but tenants seeking to prevent their displacement. The comparison highlights the likelihood that poor communities with low levels of property ownership may be less able to protect their vision of urban space.
590 $a School code: 0208.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Urban and Regional Planning. $3 1017841
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0999
710 2 0 $a University of Southern California. $3 700129
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-12A.
790 $a 0208
790 1 0 $a Preston, Michael B., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3073794