東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An analysis of adult play groups: Th...

Scott, David.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An analysis of adult play groups: Theoretical and empirical considerations.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An analysis of adult play groups: Theoretical and empirical considerations./
作者:	Scott, David.
面頁冊數:	252 p.
附註:	Adviser: Geoffrey C. Godbey.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International52-01A.
標題:	Psychology, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9117740

An analysis of adult play groups: Theoretical and empirical considerations.
Scott, David.

An analysis of adult play groups: Theoretical and empirical considerations. - 252 p.

Adviser: Geoffrey C. Godbey.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 1990.

A synthesis of sociological research pertaining to social worlds, recreation specialization, and serious leisure resulted in the creation of a conceptual model of adult play groups. The model was used to explore the nature of adult participation within a distinct social world--contract bridge. A qualitative research study of bridge groups was conducted in order to analyze bridge clubs as units of social organization, and orientations among group members in terms of their bridge preferences, commitment to group activity, and relationships to other players. Research was conducted in two phases. First, the researcher became a participant in local bridge clubs. Second, in-depth interviews were conducted with bridge players. It was discovered that players within the bridge world use the terms "social" and "serious" as a frame of reference in differentiating themselves from others. The terms also provide players a basis for comparing their groups' ways of doing things relative to other bridge clubs. In both cases, bridge players define what constitute legitimate bridge activity and who are acceptable people with whom to play bridge. As a means of exploring the social versus serious dichotomy, two typologies were presented. First, a typology of bridge groups provides a basis for understanding differences between serious and social bridge clubs in terms of recruitment processes, primary group function, types of games played, social world linkages, management of club activity, stages during bridge encounter, topics of conversation, stakes, formation of partnerships, characteristics of club members, interpersonal relationships, and types of substitutes. Second, a typology of bridge players provided a basis for distinguishing social players (occasional players and regular social players) from serious players (regular duplicate players and tournament players) on the basis of extent of identification, meaning assigned to participation, frequency of play, game and setting preferences, orientation to competition and master points, experiential foci, orientation to skill development, relationship to other players, and relationship of bridge to work, family and other leisure pursuits.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018034
Psychology, General.

An analysis of adult play groups: Theoretical and empirical considerations.
LDR:03093nam 2200277 a 45 001 935191
005 20110509
008 110509s1990 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI9117740
035 $a AAI9117740
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Scott, David. $3 526428
245 1 0 $a An analysis of adult play groups: Theoretical and empirical considerations.
300 $a 252 p.
500 $a Adviser: Geoffrey C. Godbey.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-01, Section: A, page: 0296.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 1990.
520 $a A synthesis of sociological research pertaining to social worlds, recreation specialization, and serious leisure resulted in the creation of a conceptual model of adult play groups. The model was used to explore the nature of adult participation within a distinct social world--contract bridge. A qualitative research study of bridge groups was conducted in order to analyze bridge clubs as units of social organization, and orientations among group members in terms of their bridge preferences, commitment to group activity, and relationships to other players. Research was conducted in two phases. First, the researcher became a participant in local bridge clubs. Second, in-depth interviews were conducted with bridge players. It was discovered that players within the bridge world use the terms "social" and "serious" as a frame of reference in differentiating themselves from others. The terms also provide players a basis for comparing their groups' ways of doing things relative to other bridge clubs. In both cases, bridge players define what constitute legitimate bridge activity and who are acceptable people with whom to play bridge. As a means of exploring the social versus serious dichotomy, two typologies were presented. First, a typology of bridge groups provides a basis for understanding differences between serious and social bridge clubs in terms of recruitment processes, primary group function, types of games played, social world linkages, management of club activity, stages during bridge encounter, topics of conversation, stakes, formation of partnerships, characteristics of club members, interpersonal relationships, and types of substitutes. Second, a typology of bridge players provided a basis for distinguishing social players (occasional players and regular social players) from serious players (regular duplicate players and tournament players) on the basis of extent of identification, meaning assigned to participation, frequency of play, game and setting preferences, orientation to competition and master points, experiential foci, orientation to skill development, relationship to other players, and relationship of bridge to work, family and other leisure pursuits.
590 $a School code: 0176.
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Sociology, General. $3 1017541
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0814
710 2 0 $a The Pennsylvania State University. $3 699896
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 52-01A.
790 $a 0176
790 1 0 $a Godbey, Geoffrey C., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1990
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9117740