東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An empirical investigation of the ef...

Wheeler, Bradley Charles.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An empirical investigation of the effects of process restrictiveness sources on the perceptions and performance of decision-making groups in a group support system environment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An empirical investigation of the effects of process restrictiveness sources on the perceptions and performance of decision-making groups in a group support system environment./
作者:	Wheeler, Bradley Charles.
面頁冊數:	297 p.
附註:	Chair: Joseph S. Valacich.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International54-09A.
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9404389

An empirical investigation of the effects of process restrictiveness sources on the perceptions and performance of decision-making groups in a group support system environment.
Wheeler, Bradley Charles.

An empirical investigation of the effects of process restrictiveness sources on the perceptions and performance of decision-making groups in a group support system environment. - 297 p.

Chair: Joseph S. Valacich.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 1993.

These results have implications for the design and organizational adoption of GSS technology. They can help guide efforts to embed group decision process expertise in GSSs.Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

An empirical investigation of the effects of process restrictiveness sources on the perceptions and performance of decision-making groups in a group support system environment.
LDR:03123nam 2200301 a 45 001 934460
005 20110509
008 110509s1993 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI9404389
035 $a AAI9404389
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Wheeler, Bradley Charles. $3 676728
245 1 0 $a An empirical investigation of the effects of process restrictiveness sources on the perceptions and performance of decision-making groups in a group support system environment.
300 $a 297 p.
500 $a Chair: Joseph S. Valacich.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 54-09, Section: A, page: 3519.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 1993.
520 $a These results have implications for the design and organizational adoption of GSS technology. They can help guide efforts to embed group decision process expertise in GSSs.
520 $a Group Support Systems (GSSs) have been advanced to improve group decision making. Much work on group decision making has advocated that groups use structured decision procedures or heuristics to enhance their decision processes. Organizational research, however, has documented that groups seldom adhere to structured decision procedures, instead they pattern group interaction in ways which are more familiar or less effortful. The present research extends adaptive structuration theory by investigating the role of process restrictiveness. An experiment evaluated the efficacy of facilitation-based, user-based (e.g., training), and technology-based sources of process restrictiveness to improve group outcomes. The process restrictiveness sources were investigated individually and in combinations. Five person groups worked on an intellective hidden-profile task and all groups used a GSS. Group level measures of decision quality and consensus along with individual member satisfaction were assessed among eight different process restrictiveness treatments.
520 $a The results found that the three sources of process restrictiveness frequently interacted to moderate decision quality, consensus, and satisfaction. In general, facilitation resulted in high decision quality, low process satisfaction, high outcome satisfaction, and no impact on consensus. User training resulted in low decision quality, low process satisfaction, high outcome satisfaction, and low consensus. System-based process restrictiveness resulted in low decision quality, high process satisfaction, low outcome satisfaction, and high consensus.
520 $a Facilitation was effective in correcting process deviations when the group strayed from the structured decision procedure. User training produced an awareness of the decision procedure, but did not sufficiently equip the groups to faithfully appropriate it. System-based process restrictiveness provided procedural focus for the group.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0623
710 2 0 $a Indiana University. $3 960096
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 54-09A.
790 $a 0093
790 1 0 $a Valacich, Joseph S., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1993
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9404389