東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The roots of revisionism and status-...

Davidson, Jason William.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The roots of revisionism and status-quo seeking: Opportunities and pressures at the international and domestic levels.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The roots of revisionism and status-quo seeking: Opportunities and pressures at the international and domestic levels./
作者:	Davidson, Jason William.
面頁冊數:	355 p.
附註:	Mentor: Charles A. Kupchan.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-04A.
標題:	History, Modern. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3011178
ISBN:	0493209220

The roots of revisionism and status-quo seeking: Opportunities and pressures at the international and domestic levels.
Davidson, Jason William.

The roots of revisionism and status-quo seeking: Opportunities and pressures at the international and domestic levels. - 355 p.

Mentor: Charles A. Kupchan.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2001.

The recent return of revisionism and status-quo seeking to international relations theory has raised an important question; what are the origins of revisionism (seeking goods, e.g., territory, not presently held), status-quo seeking (seeking to maintain the status quo), or an apathetic stance toward the status quo (seeking only to defend one's borders)? This question has important implications for policymakers seeking to keep rivals, such as China, from becoming revisionist and for neoclassical realist theory, which currently uses revisionism and status-quo seeking without a theory of origins. I assume that a state's rising or declining relative power determines the goals it will consider. Consequently, I seek to explain <italic>under what conditions rising states become revisionist and declining states become status-quo seekers</italic>.

ISBN: 0493209220Subjects--Topical Terms:

516334
History, Modern.

The roots of revisionism and status-quo seeking: Opportunities and pressures at the international and domestic levels.
LDR:03428nam 2200313 a 45 001 933763
005 20110506
008 110506s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493209220
035 $a (UnM)AAI3011178
035 $a AAI3011178
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Davidson, Jason William. $3 1257494
245 1 0 $a The roots of revisionism and status-quo seeking: Opportunities and pressures at the international and domestic levels.
300 $a 355 p.
500 $a Mentor: Charles A. Kupchan.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-04, Section: A, page: 1567.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2001.
520 $a The recent return of revisionism and status-quo seeking to international relations theory has raised an important question; what are the origins of revisionism (seeking goods, e.g., territory, not presently held), status-quo seeking (seeking to maintain the status quo), or an apathetic stance toward the status quo (seeking only to defend one's borders)? This question has important implications for policymakers seeking to keep rivals, such as China, from becoming revisionist and for neoclassical realist theory, which currently uses revisionism and status-quo seeking without a theory of origins. I assume that a state's rising or declining relative power determines the goals it will consider. Consequently, I seek to explain <italic>under what conditions rising states become revisionist and declining states become status-quo seekers</italic>.
520 $a Rooted in the realist approach, I argue that the <italic>opportunities </italic>states face and the <italic>pressures</italic> states are subject to determine their objectives. First, states are likely to adopt goals when the material capabilities of their expected alliance outweighs their expected rivals'—when capabilities are adjusted to account for relative resolve. However, this balance of allied resolve only presents states with an opportunity. International and domestic level pressures determine whether states take advantage of it. The more concerned with security and/or autonomy they are, the more likely rising states are to become revisionist and the more likely declining states are to become status-quo seekers. I also argue that politically relevant domestic groups trade resources for policy preferences. If pro-goods groups, e.g., nationalists, dominate the government, rising states are more likely to become revisionist and declining states are more likely to become status-quo seekers than if anti-goods groups, e.g. welfare beneficiaries, dominate.
520 $a These claims lead to five specific hypotheses on the interaction effects of the three independent variables. I evaluate the hypotheses with congruence procedure and process-tracing methods. I draw extensively on published primary sources for two case studies of rising states—France (1789–93) and Italy (1922–39)—and two cases of declining states—Britain (1899–1911), and France (1919–36). I also discuss two briefer cases: Japan (1960–1987) and Austria (1812–22).
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a History, Modern. $3 516334
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0582
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0616
710 2 0 $a Georgetown University. $3 1017582
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-04A.
790 $a 0076
790 1 0 $a Kupchan, Charles A., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3011178