東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The vagueness doctrine in Canadian c...

Ribeiro, Marc.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law: A balanced approach.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law: A balanced approach./
作者:	Ribeiro, Marc.
面頁冊數:	371 p.
附註:	Adviser: Patrick J. Monahan.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-04A.
標題:	Canadian Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ67941
ISBN:	0612679411

The vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law: A balanced approach.
Ribeiro, Marc.

The vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law: A balanced approach. - 371 p.

Adviser: Patrick J. Monahan.

Thesis (D.Jur.)--York University (Canada), 2001.

This dissertation explores the void-for-vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law. Vague laws are constitutionally suspect because they fail to provide “fair notice” to citizens as to what the law prescribes and also because they increase the discretionary powers of law-enforcing authorities.

ISBN: 0612679411Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020605
Canadian Studies.

The vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law: A balanced approach.
LDR:03932nam 2200313 a 45 001 931893
005 20110429
008 110429s2001 eng d
020 $a 0612679411
035 $a (UnM)AAINQ67941
035 $a AAINQ67941
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Ribeiro, Marc. $3 1255467
245 1 0 $a The vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law: A balanced approach.
300 $a 371 p.
500 $a Adviser: Patrick J. Monahan.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: A, page: 1533.
502 $a Thesis (D.Jur.)--York University (Canada), 2001.
520 $a This dissertation explores the void-for-vagueness doctrine in Canadian constitutional law. Vague laws are constitutionally suspect because they fail to provide “fair notice” to citizens as to what the law prescribes and also because they increase the discretionary powers of law-enforcing authorities.
520 $a In order to understand the operation of this contemporary doctrine it is useful to explore first some other related principles which possess deeper roots in our legal tradition. Among these principles, legality and the rule of law represent key elements, as they are closely related to the ideals of “fair notice” and “limitation of law-enforcement discretion” which both lie at the core of the vagueness doctrine. The principle of legality condemns the <italic>ex post facto</italic> creation of penal law in order to avoid “unfair surprise” for citizens. This principle is protected under s. 11(<italic>g</italic>) of the <italic>Charter</italic>. As for the rule of law, it is an “unwritten principle” of the Constitution which favours pre-established rules over grants of discretionary powers in order to protect citizens from arbitrary government.
520 $a After an analysis of legality and the rule of law in general, this thesis undertakes a specific study of the contents of the vagueness doctrine. The Supreme Court of Canada has put forward a general test for determining the validity of legislation under the doctrine. A law will be upheld provided it offers merely a “basis for legal debate”. This same permissive test has been declared to be applicable to all laws, whether civil, administrative, penal or other. This dissertation draws from the principles of legality and the rule of law to argue that, although this “legal debate” test may be appropriate for some laws, another, more demanding approach may be more appropriate in other circumstances. Thus, particularly in relation to coercive enactments such as penal laws, as well as in relation to statutes which could easily have been drafted more precisely without impinging on the legislative objectives, a stricter approach may be more suitable. The thesis then suggests some techniques which could help achieve greater certainty in legislative drafting without compromising the needed flexibility in law.
520 $a This dissertation also studies the appropriate place of the vagueness doctrine in the context of the <italic>Charter</italic>. To this day, the doctrine has not yet been granted an autonomous status for invalidating legislation. This means that it must always be invoked in conjunction with another <italic> Charter</italic> right in order to become applicable. In this manner, vagueness can sometimes be applied in conjunction with the related doctrine of overbreadth. This dissertation examines the different situations in which vagueness can be applicable and also explores future avenues which could broaden the doctrine's applicability.
590 $a School code: 0267.
650 4 $a Canadian Studies. $3 1020605
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0385
690 $a 0398
710 2 0 $a York University (Canada). $3 1017889
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-04A.
790 $a 0267
790 1 0 $a Monahan, Patrick J., $e advisor
791 $a D.Jur.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ67941