東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Evaluation of the oppressed: A socia...

Ibrahim, Mohamed Ismail.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluation of the oppressed: A social justice approach to program evaluation (Sudan, Massachusetts).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluation of the oppressed: A social justice approach to program evaluation (Sudan, Massachusetts)./
作者:	Ibrahim, Mohamed Ismail.
面頁冊數:	271 p.
附註:	Director: Robert Miltz.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-01A.
標題:	Education, Adult and Continuing. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3078693
ISBN:	0493997075

Evaluation of the oppressed: A social justice approach to program evaluation (Sudan, Massachusetts).
Ibrahim, Mohamed Ismail.

Evaluation of the oppressed: A social justice approach to program evaluation (Sudan, Massachusetts). - 271 p.

Director: Robert Miltz.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2003.

In this dissertation, I explore a different concept in program evaluation. There is little literature on using evaluation research as a tool for social justice. The Oppression Evaluation Approach I am introducing is about an alternative method in conducting program evaluation under dominant political conditions, simply dealing with the ethical question: whose side are the evaluators on? The study is based on the experiences of environmental activists in Sudan who have worked under oppressive environments for decades, and how this reflected on the microenvironment of projects run by authoritative managements.

ISBN: 0493997075Subjects--Topical Terms:

626632
Education, Adult and Continuing.

Evaluation of the oppressed: A social justice approach to program evaluation (Sudan, Massachusetts).
LDR:03249nam 2200301 a 45 001 931659
005 20110429
008 110429s2003 eng d
020 $a 0493997075
035 $a (UnM)AAI3078693
035 $a AAI3078693
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Ibrahim, Mohamed Ismail. $3 1255236
245 1 0 $a Evaluation of the oppressed: A social justice approach to program evaluation (Sudan, Massachusetts).
300 $a 271 p.
500 $a Director: Robert Miltz.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-01, Section: A, page: 0105.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2003.
520 $a In this dissertation, I explore a different concept in program evaluation. There is little literature on using evaluation research as a tool for social justice. The Oppression Evaluation Approach I am introducing is about an alternative method in conducting program evaluation under dominant political conditions, simply dealing with the ethical question: whose side are the evaluators on? The study is based on the experiences of environmental activists in Sudan who have worked under oppressive environments for decades, and how this reflected on the microenvironment of projects run by authoritative managements.
520 $a The purpose of this study was: (1) To critically review the concept of educational evaluation, with a focus on areas that are not usually tackled, e.g., evaluation abuse. I introduce a number of illegitimate purposes for doing program evaluations in addition to the ones cited in the U.S.A evaluation literature. I also highlight major contemporary models and approaches, which have emerged during the past three decades. (2) To introduce a new approach or model, tentatively called Oppression Evaluation, to develop its theoretical framework based on my experience with evaluation projects in the Third World. I accomplished this and introduced the distinct characteristics of this approach (pre-starting conditions, evaluators' role, covert agenda, power relationships, type of data, risk factors, etc.). This was a major achievement of this research. (3) To explore similarities and differences of this approach in two environmental social justice projects in Sudan and Massachusetts, using a comparative case study design. The key findings were similar methods used in both cases, even with different political environments, due to the shared environmental vision by the two organizations.
520 $a The adopted methodology in this research was qualitative, focusing on detailed descriptions of the two case studies. I relied on my role in the Sudanese case on reviewing its literature and documents, and introducing a distinguished data gathering technique that is used among left movement in Sudan, and called “Zameel Network.” In the second case, I gathered data via email, media documentation, in-depth interviews, direct and participant-observation, and photography.
590 $a School code: 0118.
650 4 $a Education, Adult and Continuing. $3 626632
650 4 $a Education, Sociology of. $3 626654
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0516
710 2 0 $a University of Massachusetts Amherst. $3 1019433
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-01A.
790 $a 0118
790 1 0 $a Miltz, Robert, $e advisor
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3078693